Treating obesity as a moral failing is shitty. That's what I think.
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
-14 points (25.0% liked)
General Discussion
12096 readers
21 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy.World General!
This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.
πͺ About Lemmy World
π§ Finding Communities
Feel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!
Also keep an eye on:
For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!
π¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:
- [email protected] - Note this is for more serious discussions.
- [email protected] - The opposite of the above, for more laidback chat!
- [email protected] - Into video games? Here's a place to discuss them!
- [email protected] - Watched a movie and wanna talk to others about it? Here's a place to do so!
- [email protected] - Want to talk politics apart from political news? Here's a community for that!
Rules
Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.
0. See: Rules for Users.
- No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: even with βsillyβ questions. The world wonβt be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
- Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
- Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
- No Ads/Spamming.
- No NSFW content.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK1zePxBJu4
There's an interesting new model, " the hormonal model " instead of the calorie model. It correlates well with the rise of obesity in the West and now in the east.
If the hormones are out of balance, the body cannot reach homeostasis, which it really wants to do.
Looking at it as a spiritual failure, puts people to disadvantage to fix the problem. Which is to get out of hormonal dysregulation
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=OK1zePxBJu4
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
what are the recommendations for balancing the hormones (tl;dw if video discusses it?)
Tldr of the video: reduce/remove sugar and carbohydrates. Sugar and carbs increase blood sugar, which the body regulates with insulin. Modern food is full of it. So if you eat all the time, all day, your insulin is always high.. insulin is a super hormone, which regulates everything in the body..
Basically it's like trying to park a car with your foot always on the gas.
so eat a ton of protein and fat instead?
Basically, yes. That YouTube channel talks about it.
Lots of names for it, low carb, ketogenic diet, carnivore, etc.
Even time restricted eating, or one meal a day.
Just give your body time to work without forcing the insulin levels high.
Lol, or ya know, vegetables
Gluttony: the word we use to distinguish between those with a high metabolism and those with a low one.
Seriously, this is asinine. No, the obesity epidemic is not a spiritual one. It's a cultural health and science one, because we haven't had normal chemicals in our bodies in a century.
So, you are just assuming that "sin" is a universal truth and starting your argument from there, huh?
I'm not religious, but lately I've been having a lot more appreciation for the lessons in the world's religions.
People don't like the idea of being judged, but reality will ruthlessly wipe you and your bloodline out of existence, and in that way it doesn't matter if you want to be judged or not, you will be judged and erased from history if you come up short.
I got a lot of downvotes on this on lemmyworld but I may be speaking from a different perspective of already assuming that there are certain physical or scientific factors involved... it just doesn't seem like enough to explain all the obesity we see in the world
also there seems to be some confusion, either all the factors are known for losing weight and people won't do it (which is some kind of choice or spiritual issue), or we don't know what all the factors are and you couldn't in theory rule out something extra-scientific or there is more to the story... which is what we should discuss (I could see people disagreeing with me and having a good discussion about it but the downvotes seem like a little much)
Life isn't fair, sometimes it's easier to be virtuous for some people than others. It doesn't mean virtue isn't virtuous because it's harder.
A couple generations ago, fat people were super rare because there wasn't that much food and the food we had was kinda boring. Basic meals like meal after meal of bread, or potatoes, if you were lucky some meat, no spices like we think of today. In fact, our propensity for gaining weight comes from the reality that in the past you were much more likely to die of starvation than of overeating.
But also, it was much easier back then to be a violent wrathful person. To be strong enough to defend yourself but to not abuse that strength is a virtue whether it's easy or not.
If one grows up on a monestary and never sees a member of the opposite sex, it is easy to be chaste, but that doesn't mean it isn't a virtue to be chaste in a hypersexualized culture where you can't escape the temptation for lust, and that's something we deeply desire the same as food on an existential level.
If one grows up under the boot of a tyrannical aristocracy, it may be easy not to be prideful, but that doesn't mean humility stops being a virtue.
I've noticed people love their downvote brigades. You can take the redditor out of reddit, but you can't take the reddit out of the redditor.
Do you know of any real world examples in which a problem has a potential scientific solution and a potential spiritual solution, and the spiritual solution is more effective?
well psychology can be pretty non-scientific for one
Psychology is not a scientific field because it does not meet the five basic requirements for a field to be considered scientifically rigorous: clearly defined terminology, quantifiability, highly controlled experimental conditions, reproducibility, and predictability and testability.
lust might be another problem like gluttony for another