this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
26 points (90.6% liked)

TechTakes

1618 readers
190 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Also the hivemind seems to have taken against ~~tweets~~Xeets, a stunning reversal from last year when St. Elon was gonna usher in a new Dawn of civilized discourse.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just because a Twitter said it's over doesn't mean it's over. Prediction markets still think there's a ~1/5 chance of it being legit.

This is basically the epitome of postmodernism these people love dunking on. There's no external truth, only utterances. When prediction markets have hegemony, that will be Truth.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

unlike you, science-believing simpletons, i get truth about the world from the only reliable source: weighted average of gut feelings of gamblers pretending to be day traders

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

A based take on markets. I agree with this statement.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I nominate the term "orange poster" (and possibly "orange poaster" for the rats) henceforth

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

It is a very highly resistive poor quality material. Period. No point in fighting with the truth. Data have spoken.

The way this phrase is worded is weird in my opinion. It sounds more like a political statement rather than a scientific one.

This isn't the first unprofessional message from that Twitter account during the lk99 saga. Their biased tone makes them untrustworthy. Even more than anime girl et al

I keep seeing posts exactly like these from the orange site’s top minds. it’s not doing what they think it’s doing for their reputation as science understanders. shit, anyone who’s hung around in a lab when a result won’t replicate knows the tone of that tweet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Haha it's [flagged] now. The fragile orangicity :D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Hard to say if it's violent disagreement or that the link is perceived to be "broken".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

that thread is mind numbingly stupid even for HN

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

superior rationalists trained by EY are obviously better than anyone else, how they dare to come against them with some flimsy "empirical evidence" smh

it's like with metamed but without the actual thing

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and also, that alleged levitation video on bilibili, author already admitted that it was fraud. wonder how orange site reacts to that development https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-video-fraud-taken-down

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

the orange site seems to have flagged the linked thread to death, but check out the currently active thread for more of the worst takes available on why this having all of the hallmarks of scientific fraud doesn’t matter, how dare we make value judgements

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I'm wryly amused that of all people, the rats putting their dismal hopes into the prediction markets not going to zero are the ones screeching about scientism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This Twitter post from the guy who was synthesising the stuff in the US seems convincing: https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1689476909208600576

Not a superconductor - the hints of superconductor-like properties were due to a combination of iron contamination in the Pb forming iron fragments which (surprise!) show ferromagnetism & Copper Sulphide which shows a very similarly anomalous temp/resistivity profile (but is not a superconductor).

The most likely outcome (i.e., not a superconductor, lab error due to honest scientists being fooled by their own experiments) seems to be probably the true one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

The Russian grifter was weird.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Looking through the threads most people only read the last tweet in the x thread and didn't see the link to evidence.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Ignoring HN illiteracy that might be mostly on Elon Musk. Xitter [ˈʃɪɾ.ɚ] as of now doesn't show the full thread unless you're logged in. Surely this will have no impact on its (already inflated) perceived credibility and usefulness as a news source.