points finger Ha ha!
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Roadcam
292 readers
1 users here now
Your Road-side Entertainment
Most content is allowed as long as it pertains to methods of transport on a road (cars, bikes, etc). This includes videos, images, compilations, and more.
Rules:
- English titles only.¹
- Posts must be related to vehicles or roads.
- All posts should be "raw footage" and not "produced". This means no video essays.
- No graphic gore or death ("NSFL").²
- All Lemmy.ca rules apply and will be actively enforced.
If you have an original source or know the location, please share!
¹ Comments can be any language.
² Non-graphic injuries and death are allowed. This may be revised later.
Have feedback?
If you find certain link sources annoying, titles ugly or frustrating, or have a rule suggestion, feel free to make a [Discussion] post about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ah, justice was swift.
As it was Texas, did a gunfight ensue? :-p
This is an excellent example of why you cant give away your right of way. The car that waited "gave" the SUV permission, but couldnt speak for any other road user.
I disagree, the highlander was accelerating and clearly planning to turn whether the POV car stopped or not. POV driver didn't "give away" his right of way, they were merely reacting to what the Highlander driver was doing. To hit the brakes when someone is turning right in front of you would be the reaction from many drivers and IMO is the only sane reaction to that. Was the POV driver supposed to accelerate towards him in some sort of stupid game of chicken? That would be the reaction of an insane person who should not be driving at all.