this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
-7 points (46.0% liked)

piracy

657 readers
7 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21racecar12 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought this screenshot was a known fake

[–] ipha 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah it's fake and who watches xvid encodes anyway?

[–] induna_crewneck 4 points 1 year ago

Didn't even know avi is still used. Haven't seen one in ages

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gatekeeping video codecs, that's some next-level neckbeardery right there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gatekeeping

How is it gatekeeping to call out a codec that (rightfully so) isn't being used anymore?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

why is no one talking about it?

Because it's not fucking real.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Time to switch to a true operating system.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Source for picture? I thought pluton wasn't widely rolled out yet and was still experimental.

edit: apparently after looking around its fake so the guy can post unrelated soyjak pictures

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You've posted the exact same post, same picture and title, on another instance. Smells like bot to me.

https://lemmy.world/post/986206

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does that make him a bot? lmao

[–] renzev 1 points 10 months ago

"bot" doesn't necessarily mean a literal computer program, people can be bots too. Same idea behind using "NPC" as an insult

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If I recall, it was just an edit of the smartscreen message, which has an option to continue using the software.

This definitely isn't recent, because this same picture popped up on reddit months ago.

[–] Screwthehole 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So how do you get around it? If the only answer is keep running my windows 7 machine or install Linux, I'm going to be disappointed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Fake, apparently

[–] zkfcfbzr 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the other comments I gather this is fake, but I've had similar dialogues presented to me for running untrusted .exe files. The "More info" link gives you the option to run anyways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

TBF, that’s a different story there. Firefox does the same with unsecured connections. That warning is basically there for all the non IT people who have bonuses what a signature is and run any .candycrush.exe file they see

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to be admin on my own machine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

there's always the sledgehammer protocol.. i don't think they can prevent that yet..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay I just looked and this might be fake...There's ways to disable the "smart"screen filter with the group policy editor and also regedit. If you don't have windows pro, get "policy plus", it's a project on github. It's a substitute for any system that doesn't have gpedit(dot)msc

Again...This picture is probably fake, but there's a chance that it could become real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Please drink a verification can to continue.