Can't we just filter them out by iptables rules?
this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
186 points (98.9% liked)
Linux
6596 readers
515 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Wow that was a frustrating read. I dd not know it was quite that bad. Just to highlight one quote
they don’t just crawl a page once and then move on. Oh, no, they come back every 6 hours because lol why not. They also don’t give a single flying fuck about
robots.txt, because why should they. [...] If you try to rate-limit them, they’ll just switch to other IPs all the time. If you try to block them by User Agent string, they’ll just switch to a non-bot UA string (no, really). This is literally a DDoS on the entire internet.
the solution here is to require logins. thems the breaks unfortunately. it'll eventually pass as the novelty wears off.
Next you'll have to invest in preventing automated signups
Signups in most platforms are quite hard. Straight up give your phone and do SMS verification, or at least give email and to register that email you will have to provide phone anyway. Captchas nowadays became so hard that even humans struggle with them and it often takes multiple attempts to get it right.
provide phone number to look at this foss project's website, not too sure about that
Honestly if any site demands my phone number it can get fucked.
not really, just tie it with 2fa SMS style and the hurdle is large enough most companies won't bother.
Alternative: require a proof of work calculation.
This is exactly what we need to do. You'd think that a FOSS WAF exists out there somewhere that can do this
There is. That screenshot you see in the article is a picture of a brand new one, Anubis
Yeah I realised that after posting. I think we need a better one to deal with the cases of letting legitimate users in easier though
It kind of sucks but it is the best we have for the moment
Make them mine a BTC block in the Browser!
^Sorry, I'm low in blood and full of mosquito vomit. That's probably making me think weird stuff.^
Whats confusing the hell out of me is: why are they bothering to scrape the git blame page? Just download the entire git repo and feed that into your LLM!
9/10 the best solution is to block nonresidential IPs. Residential proxies exist but they're far more expensive than cloud proxies and providers will ask questions. Residential proxies are sketch AF and basically guarded like munitions. Some rookie LLM maker isn't going to figure that out.
Anubis also sounds trivial to beat. If its just crunching numbers and not attempting to fingerprint the browser then its just a case of feeding the page into playwright and moving on.
I don't like the approach of banning nonresidential IPs. I think it's discriminatory and unfairly blocks out corporate/VPN users and others we might not even be thinking about. I realize there is a bot problem but I wish there was a better solution. Maybe purely proof-of-work solutions will get more popular or something.
Proof of Work is a terrible solution because it assumes computational costs are significant expense for scrapers compared to proxy costs. It'll never come close to costing the same as residential proxies and meanwhile every smartphone user will be complaining about your website draining their battery.
You can do something like only challenge data data center IPs but you'll have to do better than Proof-of-Work. Canvas fingerprinting would work.
Proof of Work is a terrible solution
Hard disagree, because:
it assumes computational costs are significant expense for scrapers compared to proxy costs
The assumption is correct. PoW has been proven to significantly reduce bot traffic... meanwhile the mere existence of residential proxies has exploded the availability of easy bot campaigns.
Canvas fingerprinting would work.
Demonstrably false... people already do this with abysmal results. Need to visit a clownflare site? Endless captcha loops. No thanks
This is the most crazy read on subject in a while. Most articles just talk about hypothetical issues of tomorrow, while this one actually full of today's problems and even costs of those issues in numbers and hours of pointless extra work. Had no idea it's already this bad.
How much you wanna bet that at least part of this traffic is Microsoft just using other companies infrastructure to mask the fact that it’s them
I doubt it since Microsoft is big enough to be a little more responsible.
What you should be worried about is the fresh college graduates with 200k of venture capital money.
Sometimes, I hate humanity.
I'm perfectly fine with Anubis but I think we need a better algorithm for PoW
Tor has one now
Maybe it can be reused for the clearnet.
You mean the TOR project?
And Tor itself
It is part of the denial of service protection
That's neat