this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
79 points (98.8% liked)

Legal News

354 readers
100 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

"This ruling undermines decades of progress in environmental protection and leaves communities vulnerable to unchecked pollution," said one critic.

Case file: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/scotus-epa-v-san-francisco-wastewater-permit-requirements-opinion.pdf

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyezOpen 9 points 21 hours ago

"if the EPA does its work, our holding should have no adverse effect on water quality."

Motherfucker you're undoing their work.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People shouldn't put up with pollution. If the courts won't block pollution, there are other ways.

[–] ZILtoid1991 7 points 22 hours ago

If the state won't do it, the people have to, with nastier methods.

[–] Diplomjodler3 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cue Trumpers drinking shit water on TikTok to own the libs.

[–] ebolapie 4 points 22 hours ago

timmy_praying.png