this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

World News

33405 readers
1010 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The revelation raises the prospect of further damaging cuts in so-called unprotected departments that were also hit in the 2010s by the austerity policies pursued by successive Conservative-led governments. Reductions in day-to-day spending, which excludes capital investment, would leave departments that have already been squeezed hardest facing further pain. Those at risk include Local Government, Culture, Justice, the Home Office, Environment, Energy, and Work and Pensions.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Keep in mind, they could've always raised taxes on the rich instead.

[–] babypigeon 6 points 2 days ago

I first read this as US, and thought, just 11%? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜„πŸ˜πŸ˜’

[–] TargaryenTKE 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Completely off-topic, but does anyone know why they have the black Union Jack? I can think of several reasons why you would want it (and it looks pretty cool ngl), I'm just curious if there is an official reason

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I don't know about a military context or if this would be acceptable to fly in this context, but flags like this are usually seen here being flown by supporters of football teams that play in black and white strips, like Newcastle United.

Artist Jonathan Parsons also made one like it back in 1993 that was about the disappearance of black and white TV and film. This photo is definitely not about that, of course, but I found it interesting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Defense".

Funny how that translates into bombs against brown people in their own country.

[–] BombOmOm 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The UK is one of the top supporters of Ukraine's defense against Russia's war of conquest of Ukraine. No way to spin that other than UK helping Ukraine's defense. British weapons are used daily to destroy the invader, as will continue until Russia goes home.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The UK intervened to stop peace negotiations early on and was complicit in undermining the implementation of Minsk II.

Like other OECD countries, the UK was and is happy to use Ukraine as a weapon against Russia, no matter how many Ukrainians die. Their strategy is to escalate, not defend.

[–] BombOmOm 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ukraine's strategy is to expel the invader and ask for any and all assistance in the defense of their country from Russia's war of conquest. All of the help from Poland, the UK, the US, Baltics, Germany, and other European countries is massively appreciated. More is requested and it's good to see the UK is stepping up in a much bigger way to assist in their defense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Ukraine’s strategy is to expel the invader and ask for any and all assistance in the defense of their country from Russia’s war of conquest.

Ukraine is not a sovereign country. Its affairs are dictated by the Western countries that pushed Euromaidan, selected its subsequent president, ensured the failure of Minsk II, and now support endless war to the last Ukrainian. So far as I can tell, there is not much strategy to Ukraine outside of "keep fighting", and their overall strategy has been absolutely desolating for the population, throwing people into meat grinder after meat grinder, which Russia finds an acceptable status quo.

All of the help from Poland, the UK, the US, Baltics, Germany, and other European countries is massively appreciated.

Is it appreciated by those being forcefully conscripted? What about the majorities who want a negotiated peace? Perhaps they do, but don't let this get in the way of understanding that endless escalation and war is not popular, and this is nevertheless what is happening.

More is requested and it’s good to see the UK is stepping up in a much bigger way to assist in their defense.

If you had read the article, you would know that it's about (1) austerity cuts justified by (2) general fund increased "defense" spending, not specifically for Ukraine-based arms. The only mention of Ukraine is Starmer's unhinged comments about potentially sending troops to Ukraine, i.e. NATO member troops to Ukraine, which is, again, only an escalation.

As I already mentioned, the goal of endless arms to Ukraine is one of escalation and using Ukrainians as fodder against Russia, not actually helping the country. The country is already ruined, it has been sold off to these OECD countries for a song (or for "defense", as the propaganda term would put it). Some "aid", getting UA's land and industries in return! Some "aid", i.e. loans with interest!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

will continue until Russia goes home.

absolutely delusional. Even the head of Ukrainian military intelligence has said that Ukraine could cease to exist by summer if a change in course isn't made. But NAFO shills on the internet are still living in their bubble, I guess.

[–] Warl0k3 3 points 2 days ago

Allright well we seem to have the Americans warming up to perform their hit number "WE TOLD YOU SO" lets see if it changes from the last fifty times we've heard it...