JD Vance telling all of Europe:
"If Your Democracy Can Be Destroyed By A Few Hundred Thousand Dollars Of Digital Ads, It Wasn't Very Strong To Begin With"
Goes well in line with this...
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
JD Vance telling all of Europe:
"If Your Democracy Can Be Destroyed By A Few Hundred Thousand Dollars Of Digital Ads, It Wasn't Very Strong To Begin With"
Goes well in line with this...
"If Your Democracy Can Be Destroyed By A Few Hundred Thousand Dollars Of Digital Ads, It Wasn't Very Strong To Begin With"
Not to detract from his general shittiness, but to be fair he's correct. How to make democracy more resilient to external bad actors is an open and very important question.
How to make democracy more resilient to external bad actors is an open and very important question.
Maybe our descendants will figure it out the next time they implement democracy.
That's assuming they survive climate change
He is on the wrong side of this argument though, suggesting any involvement in the result of even a rigged election is undemocratic, and "soviet era like".
“It looks more and more like old entrenched interest, hiding behind ugly, Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion,”
"Wait, we can 'pause' laws?"
Well, not legally. We need to make that matter again.
I'm still looking for ways to work toward that, short of violence.
Well, with Trump, the obvious answer is generally the correct one, so I'd venture to guess that he and those around him are taking bribes.
Because it's easier to offer bribes? Duh