this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
116 points (96.0% liked)

politics

20361 readers
5100 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Transparency advocates, however, warn that suspending enforcement could deal a significant blow to global anti-bribery efforts.

"This pause will work to the advantage of unscrupulous business actors around the world who until now feared U.S. criminal pursuits," Transparency International said in a statement calling on other OECD Anti-Bribery Convention members to increase their enforcement following the U.S. shift in policy.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicrookie 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JD Vance telling all of Europe:

"If Your Democracy Can Be Destroyed By A Few Hundred Thousand Dollars Of Digital Ads, It Wasn't Very Strong To Begin With"

Goes well in line with this...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"If Your Democracy Can Be Destroyed By A Few Hundred Thousand Dollars Of Digital Ads, It Wasn't Very Strong To Begin With"

Not to detract from his general shittiness, but to be fair he's correct. How to make democracy more resilient to external bad actors is an open and very important question.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How to make democracy more resilient to external bad actors is an open and very important question.

Maybe our descendants will figure it out the next time they implement democracy.

[–] kn33 4 points 6 days ago

That's assuming they survive climate change

[–] cosmicrookie 9 points 1 week ago

He is on the wrong side of this argument though, suggesting any involvement in the result of even a rigged election is undemocratic, and "soviet era like".

“It looks more and more like old entrenched interest, hiding behind ugly, Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion,”

[–] medicsofanarchy 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Wait, we can 'pause' laws?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Well, not legally. We need to make that matter again.

I'm still looking for ways to work toward that, short of violence.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Well, with Trump, the obvious answer is generally the correct one, so I'd venture to guess that he and those around him are taking bribes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because it's easier to offer bribes? Duh