this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
611 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19915 readers
4060 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
611
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

Summary

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warned that Trump’s mass deportation policy could lead to labor shortages and higher grocery prices.

Experts say agriculture, construction, and healthcare will be hardest hit, with farm output losses estimated between $30 and $60 billion.

Deportations could cost the U.S. economy up to $88 billion annually.

AOC argued that immigrant labor is vital to economic stability, urging Congress to pursue immigration reform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dustyb0tt0mz 41 points 1 day ago (13 children)

does no one else see the ethical quandary of relying on cheap exploited labor for our food?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Sure, but it’s more in the “no ethical consumption under capitalism” kind of way rather than anything specific about the exploitation of the undocumented migrants. Exploitation goes into almost everything around us, and it’s something we have to deal with and work to improve unless we want to completely disconnect from modern society.

Just scanning the room around me, I wonder what the full labor history looks like in the value chain that produced my TV, the phone in my hand, my computer parts, the shirt on my back, AND the food in my kitchen.

If some of the farm labor that went into my food was from an undocumented immigrant that really wants to stay in this country and keep his or her job, I am not happy about the set of circumstances, but I also don’t want to rip that person out of their community and send them somewhere they do not want to go.

[–] NeptuneOrbit 9 points 1 day ago

We tried to resolve this with legislation and the right wing crazies killed it each time. It's not like the average Democratic voter wants an undocumented underclass. The business interests do. And the GOP leadership gets to fund raise on the caravans.

Most Americans want a better life for these people. Step one isn't to spend a trillion dollars to deport them all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Absolutely! But at the same time, it highlights the income inequality the majority of Americans are experiencing.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am a little shocked that healthcare is in the top 3. How many undocumented nurses are there? How do they obtain licensure? Or is this all just support staff?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

According to this document from 2021, most of them are "assistants" and "aides" of various types, although it seems there are a few thousand registered nurses and other licensed healthcare providers and technicians. Maybe they get licensed on a visa and then overstay the visa?

[–] Crashumbc 21 points 1 day ago

Keep in mind, the current gov isn't just interested in "illegal" immigrants, but any non white people they can figure out a way to deport.

Many nurses are here on work visas.

[–] Tugboater203 3 points 1 day ago

Also Home Health aides, orderlies and other non licensed positions

[–] Veedem 272 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I know she’s been villainized by the right, but I feel like, at this point, she needs to be elevated to key leadership of the party. She’s the only one who seems to be able to speak to specifics. I just listened to Jeffries on Jon Stewart’s podcast and it was all of the same old generalities.

[–] [email protected] 175 points 3 days ago (23 children)

I can't speak to every politician, but as a class, they seem to be elites that are disconnected from the average American.

AOC, having been a normal person, is able to bring the message that gets through to people without having it filtered through some sort of communication agency.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Maggoty 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

Farms are just going to take it on the chin. They're losing their labor with the mass deportations and they're losing a hilariously large buyer of food with USAID being shut down.

So who's ready for the new price on food?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

And they'll blame Democrats. And the Democratic Party won't combat the misinformation because they suck at messaging.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

IMHO, Democrats have gotten much better with their messaging over the past decade. People just don't pay attention because diligently solving problems with substantial plans that take years to show effects isn't sexy or exciting.

I stay pretty keyed in to what's going on in congress, but I have to put effort into that. It seems like all the algorithms constantly want to shift my content to paying attention to all the crazy shit the GOP is up to and I'm constantly catching and stopping myself from getting sucked into rage porn.

[–] WagyuSneakers 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Saying they're good at messaging and then saying people don't paying attention enough to see it is an oxymoron. If they were good at messaging you wouldn't have to pay attention to see it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People just don’t pay attention because diligently solving problems with substantial plans that take years to show effects isn’t sexy or exciting.

Yeah maybe... But they're also so bad at even just pointing out the horrible shit Republicans are constantly doing.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage 6 points 1 day ago

You're not looking. "Now This!" and Cspan are two great YouTube channels for democratic media coverage. Dems are constantly calling Republicans out on stuff. Cspan is extra cool because they post full, unedited hearings so you get to see dems actually try to govern while the alt-righters behave like children, yell, and posture for their 30 second media clips, then sit back down and stare at their phone until it's time to talk again.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›