this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
76 points (100.0% liked)

Games

17331 readers
812 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Have any of the UK petitions ever had a response that wasn’t just “nah fuck off lol”?

[–] ampersandrew 28 points 2 days ago

This response reads as though they continue to not understand the problem.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They only got 13k signatures this time? I wonder if PirateSoftware, who I have very quickly lost respect for (like literally over the course of just a few days), had anything to do with this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop, what did he do?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

his take on the petition was uneducated and seemed to stem mostly from a pro-industry perspective. it was like he misunderstood how government petitions in europe works and based all his criticism on that misunderstanding.

basically the point he missed is that these petitions don't become laws as written, but are put up for discussion. highlighting a problem in a niche where it is easy to understand usually ends up highlighting a broader issue.

Thor took this flawed understanding and applied his substantial industry knowledge to it, which led him to the conclusion that games would be impossible to make if this petition won out because it would force companies to keep the servers up forever, which is not at all what the petition is about.

he then refused to back down from this position when people tried to explain it better.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This, but there was also the WoW situation, and when he filed a false DMCA claim against an indie developers game, which got removed from Steam (but is back up now) over content shown in a video that was not actually present in the game files (Thor did not verify that what he was claiming was actually true).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

This is the problem with people who have massive audiences, they need to verify what they claim otherwise they can do a lot of harm to people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

He definitely has had some negative impact on it considering almost every time stop killing games news pops up someone parrots his already debunked points.

[–] ampersandrew 4 points 2 days ago

A far shorter time span, and this applies only to the UK, not the EU. It got a (bad) government response, so it achieved the intended effect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That guy truly is a knob. I dropped him for his take on Stop Killing Games, it was such an obviously brain-dead take...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@CancerMancer not to mention self-motivated. Didn't he release a live service game soon after taking that stance?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know how involved he is but yes, Rivals of Aether 2.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago