this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
111 points (98.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2179 readers
847 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They're gonna have a hard time making it illegal to download a completely open source software lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, as I've learned recently, it doesn't look like Deepseek is actually open source.

You can download the model, but unless I'm misunderstanding, that feels comparable to calling Photoshop open source because you can download the .exe file on your computer.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Its MIT licensed. Meaning the code is open but the license is permissible in that copy's can be subsequently closed. This is unlike with the GPL most generally associated with open source code.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 31 minutes ago

The weights are MIT licensed. The code is, too, but code for these things are uninteresting.

The training data is not open source, and that's the interesting part of a model.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 3 points 2 hours ago

You can reweight as you please to whatever dataset you like. They can say what the training data included, but they can't share the dataset.

[–] andMoonsValue 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This comment here seems to summarize it well: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/issues/457#issuecomment-2627016777

It's more open-sourced than I thought, but also seems debatable. I don't know enough about LLMs to properly judge. I would probably stay away from calling it "completely open-sourced" though.

[–] Ensign_Crab 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do not tempt them to outlaw open source.

[–] SpaceNoodle 17 points 5 hours ago

Facebook already tipped their hand by prematurely banning posts about Linux.

[–] zkfcfbzr 35 points 7 hours ago

Well now I'm just gonna download it even harder.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Oh I thought we just did Executive Orders these days. Interesting for Congress to want to be in the pocket of the three richest men in the United States, too.

[–] Chivera 10 points 5 hours ago

Is this the bill that will finally bring egg prices down?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 hours ago

Because prohibition works, right?

[–] JeeBaiChow 11 points 6 hours ago

I guess competition isn't a thing in the us anymore. What a bunch of pussies.

[–] RizzRustbolt 19 points 7 hours ago

Yes, that will definitely put the toothpaste back.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago

Damn. Okay, everyone that's already grabbed a copy off of Ollama needs to upload it back.

[–] snekerpimp 6 points 6 hours ago

“The downloading of deep seek is causing the prices of eggs to rise, so stop the downloading and the prices will fall!”