this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
145 points (99.3% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

5932 readers
168 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"The crash caused significant damage to the aircraft". Um, what aircraft? You mean that hole in the ground?

Glad the pilot's OK.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

That doesn't look like a normal landing. They should have strapped a cat to it to stabilize the axis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Whilst in technically true that the plane was landing, I don't think he was actually making a landing.

Looked a lot more like the plane wasn't under power at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Landing gear were down, so it was likely coming in for a landing when the incident occurred. Based on the height and positioning, maybe an attempted go-around that ended in abandoning the craft entirely.

[–] extremeboredom 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't the failure rate on the F 35 like WAY higher than previous fighters? Oh well, at least Lockheed got that sweet, sweet contract, right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

It has extremely low flight time. There is also "Right to repair" issues in favour of manufacturer where they don't provide adequate manuals to keep the aircraft operational. Decline of US is affected by military mission to spend more money to political donors rather than provide value to Armed Forces.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago

Arguably F-35 have more failure points. I say this as an ex F-18 mechanic so you probably can't take me at my word

[–] recklessengagement 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's gonna be a lot of paperwork

[–] DarkShaggy 3 points 1 day ago

And meetings to discuss / review the paperwork...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago) (1 children)

Isn't that the second F35 in a few weeks? I can remember another F35 having a nose gear failure with the pilot ejecting at ground level.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't find anything in the last few weeks, there was one nearly a year ago. No ejection though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

You're right, I saw an older video and took it as new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9GBHNaYzcs

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Google says that thing cost somewhere between $82MM - $109MM. I wonder how many meals it could have been instead.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Thats a lot of millimeter dollars.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 10 points 1 day ago

As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

Wikipedia.

[–] wildcardology 2 points 1 day ago

My country benefits from military surplus aides from the U. S. I wouldn't mind if America takes care of it's children first.

[–] chakan2 0 points 18 hours ago

The R&D on that jet would have solved world hunger and provided free healthcare for the whole US. Instead, we kill our pilots with them. Excellent use of funds.

[–] Bieren 2 points 23 hours ago

It’s a feature of the software. Nothing to see here.

[–] toiletobserver 7 points 1 day ago

Shit'll buff out

[–] jqubed 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I’m not seeing a video in the post or at the link

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)