this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
153 points (99.4% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

6261 readers
91 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"The crash caused significant damage to the aircraft". Um, what aircraft? You mean that hole in the ground?

Glad the pilot's OK.

[–] extremeboredom 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Isn't the failure rate on the F 35 like WAY higher than previous fighters? Oh well, at least Lockheed got that sweet, sweet contract, right?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

Arguably F-35 have more failure points. I say this as an ex F-18 mechanic so you probably can't take me at my word

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

It has extremely low flight time. There is also "Right to repair" issues in favour of manufacturer where they don't provide adequate manuals to keep the aircraft operational. Decline of US is affected by military mission to spend more money to political donors rather than provide value to Armed Forces.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Google says that thing cost somewhere between $82MM - $109MM. I wonder how many meals it could have been instead.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 11 points 1 month ago

As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

Wikipedia.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thats a lot of millimeter dollars.

[–] wildcardology 2 points 1 month ago

My country benefits from military surplus aides from the U. S. I wouldn't mind if America takes care of it's children first.

[–] chakan2 0 points 1 month ago

The R&D on that jet would have solved world hunger and provided free healthcare for the whole US. Instead, we kill our pilots with them. Excellent use of funds.

[–] recklessengagement 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's gonna be a lot of paperwork

[–] DarkShaggy 3 points 1 month ago

And meetings to discuss / review the paperwork...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

That doesn't look like a normal landing. They should have strapped a cat to it to stabilize the axis.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Isn't that the second F35 in a few weeks? I can remember another F35 having a nose gear failure with the pilot ejecting at ground level.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't find anything in the last few weeks, there was one nearly a year ago. No ejection though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You're right, I saw an older video and took it as new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9GBHNaYzcs

[–] toiletobserver 7 points 1 month ago

Shit'll buff out

[–] jqubed 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I’m not seeing a video in the post or at the link

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] Bieren 3 points 1 month ago

It’s a feature of the software. Nothing to see here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whilst in technically true that the plane was landing, I don't think he was actually making a landing.

Looked a lot more like the plane wasn't under power at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Landing gear were down, so it was likely coming in for a landing when the incident occurred. Based on the height and positioning, maybe an attempted go-around that ended in abandoning the craft entirely.