this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1005 readers
194 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the first high-end graphics card that makes use of a PCI-Express 5.0 bus interface. Are you in trouble when try to run it on PCIe 4.0? What about x8, like when an SSD is using up some bandwidth? We've also tested various PCI-Express 3.0, 2.0 and 1.1 configs to get a feel for how FPS scales with bandwidth.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SacralPlexus 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Tl;dr: You lose about 1% of performance going from PCIE 5.0 x16 to 4.0 x16.

x16 4.0
Remember what we said about PCI-Express 5.0 x16 availability being spotty on mid-range platforms? This makes it crucial for us to see how the RTX 5090 performs on PCI-Express 4.0 x16. Since LGA1700 processors don't put out a dedicated Gen 5 NVMe connection, Intel's motherboard partners resorted to wiring out M.2 Gen 5 NVMe slots by subtracting lanes from the Gen 5 x16 PEG interface, reducing it to PCI-Express 5.0 x8, which is exactly the same bandwidth as PCI-Express 4.0 x16—an invaluable data-point for the RTX 5090. We are happy to report that performance loss in this mode is well contained, and you lose about 1% performance, across all three resolutions. There are barely any outliers to report about from our set of game tests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That's basically within the margin of error. It seems that for gaming on dGPUs, the PCIE 5.0 vs 4.0 isn't really that important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Meaning, since PCIe5 Mini-ITX boards still have a very limited selection and are still very expensive, i'll be going with a 4er board in my future-proof gaming-sffpc. Btw, that with 1% was a year ago already, so no progress there.

[–] UnfortunateShort 1 points 1 week ago

Good to know that PCIe 2.0 x16 respectively 3.0 x8 is still enough for pretty much anything less than a 5090 class card. Except for specific, comm heavy workloads maybe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Gamers Nexus has done their own, seemingly similar testing (I haven't watched it): https://youtu.be/L1NPFFRTzLo