this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
60 points (98.4% liked)

NASA

1062 readers
238 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] T00l_shed 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] halcyoncmdr 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep. But it's happening in every federal department, not just NASA. They're not directly to blame here, just doing what they're being required to do by the Executive Branch.

[–] T00l_shed 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bend the knee

[–] return2ozma 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Report dei coded and imprecise language? What in the fascist fuck does that even mean?

Fuck the people in charge at nasa.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

As I read it, it seems they want people to report if some place pretended to end DEI practices after the election but actually just reworded it so it wouldn't be directly impacted by a literal anti-DEI mandate by Trump.

The actual mail phrasing came from another government agency, the “Chief Human Capital Officers Council” (chcoc.gov); this is likely sent out far more places than just NASA.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It means report ppl who say anything about dei and ppl who are being vague about things they say. Shitty but they have to because of cheetohead

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

What sort of "adverse consequences"?

[–] return2ozma 10 points 2 weeks ago

Their Diversity & Inclusion page is now 404...

https://www.nasa.gov/odeo/diversity-and-inclusion/

[–] GlendatheGayWitch 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope they end up rehiring those who are fired for being originally hired as part of DEI. They will outshine other candidates due to their experience with current NASA projects.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

those who are fired for being originally hired as part of DEI

Are NASA actually required to do this, or have they only been ordered to suspend DEI programs for new hires?

[–] GlendatheGayWitch 2 points 1 week ago

From the article:

"In an email sent to agency employees on Wednesday afternoon, acting administrator Janet Petro wrote, "We are taking steps to close all agency DEIA offices and end all DEIA-related contracts in accordance with President Trump’s executive orders titled Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Initial Rescissions of"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The email content is the content of the template email in this "Chief Human Capital Officers Council".gov document on "Initial Guidance Regarding DEIA Executive Orders".

So while it's signed Janet Petro, she's ~*~ just following orders ~*~, and it's clear that's what the white house wants as well with that vague threat of "adverse consequences"

[–] antangil 6 points 1 week ago

You’ve got it right. She did exactly what she was told. Made no effort to reframe it in order to meet NASA comm expectations or traditions. No effort to convince NASA folks to comply. That’s not normal, and it effectively communicates that she was under duress… or at least given no real option other than resigning. I’d much rather have Janet in place than someone that really took that message to heart and tried to sell it.

[–] WrenFeathers 2 points 1 week ago

Shame. I used to like them.