Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
I hope Kent behaves, bcachefs is been working well for me on latest kernels and I'd hate to see it removed entirely.
The tooling needs some more love as well (e.g. there's currently no rebalance) but I understand the focus on the kernel bits. Recently added a drive (or rather a decrypted partition) and everything went smooth. Other places are also suspiciously quiet about bugs, in a good way.
All he has to do is put his emails on an 8hr delay-and-confirm process. Like, he writes, hits send, but then it's held for 8 hours after which he has to go back and read what he wrote and turn click "confirm."
There are a ton of issues with how he's managing the patch, so I'm being a little facetious, but I've known many people who've communicated like Kent does and adopting a wait-and-review communication model does wonders.
Drama incoming.
Michael's clickbait game is amazing lmao