this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
339 points (99.7% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1375 readers
6 users here now

Be respectful

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 3 days ago
[–] TingoTenga 33 points 3 days ago

Should be the other way around. It takes one year of profits to pay three week worth of fines.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

Do they even actually pay these fines tho? I would assume there are just endless legal battles about them and none of them have actually ever been payed.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would be more illustrative to know the percentage of the annual profits the fine costed them

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

3 weeks is about 5% of the year. Do you think that’s a more illustrative figure than 3 weeks in a year? I think you’re in the minority on that opinion.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

I would be more intrested in how long it takes them to pay a fine using the revenue from the region that fine was issued from.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I probably haven't had enough coffee yet, but what exactly is this chart trying to show? And why are MS, Meta, and Apple listed multiple times as opposed to once like they are in the article (once per section)?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's an incredibly bad chart mostly for the x-axis being so horrible in scale that March, when a lot of fines were handed out, had to be repeated twice.

What we are seeing are specific fines that were handed out. Like the Apple $2B fine is from the EU for antitrust law violation that was handed to them in March. The $89M fine was handed out by the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in October over the whole Apple Card thing and how bank disputes weren't being handled and how Goldman Sachs who backed the card wasn't keeping all of the required compliance information (which I'm shocked at how quickly everyone forgot about it).

I digress.

Yeah, this chart is incredibly bad at indicating this information and by breaking out by violation over time really takes away from the point that ought to be expressed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Yup, the x axis might as well not exist

A date on each bubble might have been better

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The article aggregated all the fines per company (though a breakdown is available at the bottom of the article). The image shows the top 8 biggest individual fines, and the companies you listed had multiple fines in the top 8.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

It shows the biggest fines imposed to each company and the month they were paid in. At the end of the article there's a list with different individual fines of each company, with the ammount fined as well as the reason and a link to a relevant article. They just took the biggest numbers for this chart. Hope this helps, and correct me if I'm wrong :)

[–] KoalaUnknown 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Too bad for Google that the fine was not issued in rubels. 20 decillion rubels is like $3.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

if we could get that to months and for all corps and it would be a decent tax rate.

[–] Blade9732 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but have you thought about the poor CEO's? These fines make it harder for Bezos to buy another yacht to take him to his yacht that tenders his main yacht.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

These fines make it harder for Bezos

Truth is he doesn't even notice it. These fines are mere days, maybe a week's worth of income to people like him.

[–] isles 2 points 2 days ago

Furthermore, the wealthy don't take cash profits to buy things, they collateralize their wealth for loans to buy yachts.