this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
17 points (90.5% liked)

Linux

1903 readers
15 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

An interesting and mammoth project. This should in theory, keep a lot of old software alive in the future. Is that its purpose?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I don't think anyone knows it's purpose. It been in prealpha for a long time.

However its pretty cool to me that we can reverse engineer windows

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

A lot of people seem to hope for this, which is probably why the project development picked its pace back up.

[–] GustavoM 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

while still in its infancy

Eheheheh.....heh....

...eh.

All "casual mockery" aside... do we really need a Linux distro that is 1/1 par with Windows? Is there anything that would benefit from this?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It isn't a Linux distro. Its built from the ground up

[–] GustavoM 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh. My point still stands however -- I (honestly) see zero purpose/reason for this project to keep on going.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

You've never run into obscure but vital software being run on old and unsupported versions of windows that also can't be moved to newer hardware. It's a niche use case, but when you consider that includes some medical equipment, that niche is way more important than it seems. There's still plenty of things running custom software that can't be changed without a fully rebuilt program that could cost enough to make it impossible for smaller organizations to feasibly do so.

Besides, it isn't like this project takes anything away from any others. The devs wouldn't just magically shift to something less niche. If they were interested in something else, they'd already be doing it. Whatever they might move to would also be a niche interest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Analogue: Why have more than one text editor when vi already exists? There's no reason for any of the others to keep on going.

Yes, there are other ways of getting Windows software to run under other operating systems; WINE being the main one, but also virtualisation, building from source, or - loosely - substituting for similar. There's only one that aims to be an OS in its own right.

You might call ReactOS the Emacs of Windows emulation. Everything else is just a text editor.