this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
72 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8910 readers
850 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zero22xx 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

NOW only it's finished? When did it become normal for these companies to release half finished trash and use their paying customers as beta testers?

[–] FooBarrington 11 points 9 hours ago

"Finished" as in "no more content", not "reached 1.0 state".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not too long after Minecraft blew up and they saw that people would willingly pay to play shit that's not finished.

[–] Zero22xx 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's one game that I never got into the hype train with and still haven't got around to trying, even though it looks like it's right up my alley. So I might be mistaken but wasn't Minecraft originally an indie effort? I don't like it but I can understand and appreciate giving indie devs support while they're still working on things a lot more than paying the mega corporation for the privilege of being a beta tester.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yeah, it was an indie thing, but it was also one of the first huge success stories from crowdfunding/early access, too. So in typical game's industry fashion, they copied it; but only the parts that make them more money for less effort.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I never played it after the terrible reviews and after seeing the ugly busy ui/damage splatter. It especially hurt as a fan of the Rocksteady batman games and huge DC comics fan. Did the updates help? Is it better? Worth a play?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it's a dying/dead live service game. Save your money and time

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 14 points 1 day ago

It's free on PS Plus already and I still can't be bothered lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

I felt like Shadow of Mordor was a decent spiritual successor, and while I haven't played Shadow of War it seems like more of the same. Same combat style as the Arkham games.

The recent Insomniac/Sony Spider-Man games also had a similar combat style.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you're absolutely set on playing it I'd say there's a fairly good chance it shows up in Humble Choice within the next year or so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Sounds like a great reason to cancel my Humble subscription

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 3 points 1 day ago

Actually, I just got it for free from my Playstation plus membership, one of this month's free downloads. Just wasn't sure if it was even worth my time

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I'll miss Concord.