UK Nature and Environment

470 readers

61 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

110

Water firm allowed to pour sewage in Windermere using permit from 1989 (inews.co.uk)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A water company is releasing sewage into a stream connected to Lake Windermere using a permit that has not been updated in more than 30 years.

The permit, which allows United Utilities to release waste into the national park site, is “unfit for purpose” and contributes to high levels of pollution and biodiversity decline in the area, according to campaigners.

The sewage being released has been treated, but campaigners say the “primitive” treatment methods at the site mean the wastewater is still harmful to the environment.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BeN9o 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd love it if these reports had actions to follow up, send me to a petition, give me the email for the CEO of United Utilities so I can pester them with emails. Direct people to action not just tell people how bad it is! I'd love to do something about this, how can we?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd suggest taking a look here.

[–] BeN9o 5 points 1 month ago

Thank you! Exactly what I was looking for!

[–] EvacuateSoul 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Discharge to bodies of water after treatment is normal. Pictured is a normal activated sludge plant, which should be capable of treating effectively. That's the clarifier top left, chlorine contact on right, aeration/digesters on bottom.

It isn't primitive. An imhoff tank and lagoon is primitive, but even those are perfectly capable of treating wastewater. It's almost always that there is more flow now than the plant is designed to handle.

If they are staying within permit, it probably allows more inflow than the plant can handle and has too loose of restrictions on the outflow tests if it is causing harm to the lake.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

And why is there more flow now than the plant is designed to handle?

Could it be because they've been taking our money for the last 35 years and giving it to shareholders instead of improving the infrastructure?

Water was a stupid thing to privatise. Even more so than the trains. It needs renationalising.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How can they have a permit unchanged for 30 years, and it not expire?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Simple. It's called lobbying, but back then was just a plain simple white fat envelope full of notes. Some simple folks might call it bribery