this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
62 points (91.9% liked)

Games

32687 readers
1220 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR Copyright strikes

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it copyright strikes? That's not what the article says.

While the Pokemon bans would arouse suspicion of The Pokemon Company taking action, the Pokemon publisher is not believed to be involved with the bans. Several of the affected content creators, including the previously mentioned PokeRev, have previously worked with The Pokemon Company in an official capacity. Many were even invited as guests to major Pokemon events like the Pokemon World Championships. Neither Instagram nor parent company Meta has commented on the unexpected wave of bans against the Pokemon content creators.

And if you watch the embedded video, his ban message just says "Community Guidelines" and it sounds like nobody has been able to get a straight answer about it. Also, he got his account back automatically after verifying his contact info, and he doesn't know why that worked either because he didn't change anything, while some other people with the same ban message instead received automatic appeal rejections, which is wild because nobody can tell what the difference is between accounts that got auto-reinstated and the ones that got auto-rejected.

There is someone in the Youtube comments claiming that usernames containing Poke, Poki, or Pokemon are getting auto-flagged by a bot, which sort of makes sense (except that it doesn't explain the differing appeal outcomes) and was something he speculated in the video, but they are cagey about their sources so I'm consigning that to Youtube comments rumormill until I see better info.

[–] Carighan 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Mysteriously". Of course it's copyright strikes by either Nintendo or one of the firms they pay to hunt for this.

[–] handhookcardoor 3 points 1 year ago

Wouldn’t it be on the Pokemon Company?

[–] ABCDE -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Moving to platforms like this is really being pushed more than ever with nonsense like the above.

[–] Master 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first time one of these lemmy servers gets hit with official court papers thing will no doubt change. A big part of the operation budget (well maybe not so big of a percentage but big as in price) is to hire a legal team to handle stuff like this and juggle international laws.

I imagine a few lemmy instances will be killed by things like this.

[–] ABCDE 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then we make another, or move to another; as they're all linked, it will not really affect anything.

[–] tabular 1 points 1 year ago

The Amazon warehouse hiring method, go through them all?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ABCDE 3 points 1 year ago

We're here.