They will, thats what he is here for. Seal the power of the corpos during these last 5 years of livable climate.
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
472 readers
244 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only
▪️ Title must match the article headline
▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)
▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.
Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean, they posted the other day funding for the same fund between Biden and Trump, they are definitly funneling money in to do this. I think it should be expected at this point, should be looking into how to outlaw it rather than worrying if its going to happen. If it's legal, it will be abused. The fact that it's legal in the first place is the issue.
Being said, it goes to say, I believe an anti-trust case still goes through legal provisions, so I think he could just pardon the entire case.
I foresee part of his funding being explicitly for that.
Sadly the US government functions vastly on the honor and trust system, if you have elected officials that aren't honorary, the system can and will be abused as there isn't very much actual checks and balances on it for individual cases. The checks and balances existing almost completely skip the supreme court, and the actual positions of power such as the speaker, the VP and the president do not have many checks and balances for the position itself, relying on the branch itself to keep itself in line and once someone that is found untrustworthy is placed into the position, its likely not going to be reverted. It's very much a "we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing" scenario.