this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
123 points (99.2% liked)

Historical Artifacts

641 readers
311 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/551012

Athos77 added the following context when this was posted back on Kbin (RIP)

The inscription reads right to left on all three lines. Starting with the bottom line the hieroglyphs translate as follows:

Duck: biliteral sign sA (“son”) Red crown of northern/lower Egypt: uniliteral sign n (preposition “of”) Reed leaf: uniliteral sign i Senet game board: biliteral sign mn Water squiggle: uniliteral sign n (phonetic complement, simply reinforces the reading of mn) Seated man: determinative (word classifier, not read aloud)

Put together, you get his name sA-n-Imn, or Sienamun as the Met calls him. Translated literally, “son of (the god) Amun.”

The first two lines note that Sienamun was not only a priest (Hm-nTr) but also an overseer of horses (imy-r smsmw).

[–] Psychodelic 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At the time, would this be easier to make in a cast or with a little chisel?

[–] PugJesus 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm no expert on ancient metallurgy, but I think gold is pretty easy to work, so probably with tools rather than a cast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Definitely looks like tool marks in the crevaces