-8
This implies Heard was in the right and from what I can tell she lost all 3 defamation trials. That's not absolute proof of anything, but it's sure not making me believe her claims.
Am I missing something?
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
-8 points (34.6% liked)
Feminism
337 readers
18 users here now
Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!
Rules:
- This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
- Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
- Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
- Follow site-wide rules.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
she lost all 3 defamation trials
Could you provide some more info on this? I am only aware of 2 relevant trials:
- the first in UK that she won, and
- the 2nd in the US that she lost.
but it's sure not making me believe her claims
Please keep in mind that in the US trial - the televised one - the defence team used in court a specific tactic that is typically used against sexual assault & domestic violence victims, called:
Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender
This tactic is (unfortunately) very effective in trials with jurors and this one of the reasons that the outcome of the US trial was in favor of the abuser. Judges rarely fall for it.
Scary thing to have this post, so heavily downvoted in a feminist community.