Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
There are technical reasons we can't keep WW3 sized stockpiles. The ammunition has a shelf life. Does no good to build up massive stockpiles only for a huge hunk of it to be bad by the time you can actually use it.
But, I guess the author missed that part in their zeal to create a right wing talking point.
The critical thing is not to have stockpiles, it's to retain an industrial knowledge base. Machine tools can be acquired and raw materials sourced quickly in an emergency. What you can't ramp up are the experience of the people running the factories.
So the trick is to pay for a steady supply of ammunition, even if you throw it away, just to keep a critical mass of factory workers trained.
Also, having strong recycling program in that stuff can do a lot in war time, and peace time.
Hrmmmm...seems like Russia, huh? Almost like if someone was pulling strings, the US will devolve into a similar state. Wonder how and why that would be? 🤔