this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
384 points (85.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21881 readers
985 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 4 points 1 month ago

    Frets On Fire solo

    [–] foggy 71 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    If you think being on Linux makes you immune for attacks, I have bad news for you.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    there are much less vulrenabilities on Linux. No system is totally unpenetrable, but having 2-5 vulrebabilities is always better than having 30-40

    [–] foggy 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I've got a link for you to click, Mr super secure OS user. I promise your OS will protect you.

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Here I have a cool program to install. Just pipe this link into bash really quick...

    [–] kn33 12 points 1 month ago

    With sudo. Can't forget that or it won't work.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    you are just exploiting my words. I never said Linux will protect me whatever happens. But it will have a better protection inherently, than any windows

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

    Realistically the difference is in how Linux mitigates the common vectors for attack that Windows doesn't. Most malware targeting individual workstations gets in by either supply chain attack, vulnerable web renderer or by tricking the user into installing it.

    Centralized repositories with centralized build tooling limits opportunities for supply chain attacks, plus helps prevent users from accidentally downloading a Trojan when trying to grab other software. Containerizing web applications helps limit browser exploits, and less "features" phoning home means a default incoming-deny firewall policy will largely prevent most vulnerabilities from being remotely serious.

    So for an individual workstation, Linux is significantly safer from viruses. In the enterprise it's a completely different story where the threat environment does require defense in depth regardless of your choices of vendors

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Regardless of us using Linux on our home computers, most businesses and services use Windows machines. Your information is likely still stored on Windows machines elsewhere if you interact with the world at all.

    With that in mind, it's worth being aware of Windows security problems when they come up.

    [–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

    Got it, stop interacting with the world

    I was already mostly doing this so

    [–] postmateDumbass 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    What would we do when these happen? What could we do in the moment to change anything?

    Join an eventual class action?

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Trail 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Taking the internet into consideration, I would doubt "most".

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago
    [–] iopq 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    People here running *nix OSes while I run a Nix*OS

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I mean... a form of Microsoft Defender is available for Linux, but only for enterprise customers if I remember correctly 😅

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

    Yep, my company allows me to use Linux but for Compliance Reasons I need to have Microsoft Defender installed and running. Still beats Windows 11 by a mile

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    and it will suck your servers dry.

    [–] kn33 4 points 1 month ago

    Eh, it's not too bad when properly configured.

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Sometimes Mint tells me there are security updates available. Happened just this morning. Updating makes me feel good :)

    [–] Diplomjodler3 6 points 1 month ago

    And I can do it wherever I want. And my work is in no way interrupted, while the updates go through.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    And it had the Edge of not installing Candy Crush

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] DragonsInARoom 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Is not having an anti-virus good for most people though?

    [–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    most antivirus apps are very invasive, heavy on resources and even spy on you. Windows defender is usually enough. However, virustotal is still recommended

    [–] DragonsInARoom 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Is this something that someone who doesn't have tech as a hobby cares enough about to change they're os?

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

    I would say yes? Many if my friends in uni were using laptops that had McAfee built in. I'm not exaggerating when I say they were unusable. I removed that shit and those machines were snappy af.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

    On one side, if you have a brain you're fine.
    On the other side, *glances at general public typing google.com into google* ...yeah

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Anti-virus is not going to stop you from stupidity. You classic "Anti-virus" won't stop anything more than run of the mill simple stuff.

    [–] DragonsInARoom 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Most of the time that's what people need an antivirus for, most attacks the average person will suffer will be some script that's easily caught by the antivirus.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

    Same for people using windows 7

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

    there is an update, i applied it at the weekend

    load more comments
    view more: next ›