this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
393 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 21 hours ago
[–] JubilantJaguar 19 points 23 hours ago

Quick primer. This is not the Parliament. This is the Council, the intergovernmental branch of the EU. Specifically, a meeting of national justice ministers. They sometimes vote but their real objective is to find consensus, since the EU is not a federation and it's politically hard to pass anything against the wishes of national governments. If they can agree, then it goes to the Parliament, which definitely does vote and is obviously a bit more open to influence from ordinary voters.

From the agenda for tomorrow:

Ministers will also exchange views on the concluding report of the high-level group on access to data for effective law enforcement. At this year’s June meeting of home affairs ministers the Council welcomed the group’s 42 recommendations on access to data. At the upcoming meeting ministers will discuss the way forward now that the group has presented its concluding report.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess these guys haven't read about Salt Typhoon, huh?

US backdoors are wide open at this point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Western states have long known that their backdoors will inevitable be accessed by others. They want access to your data, and they don’t especially care if that means other states will also get access.

They don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t give a fuck about you. They don’t care about you. At all. At all. At all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah but you'd think if they cared about themselves, they'd realize how this hurts them long-term, too.

I think, really, the point is that they're too short-sighted to see how this impacts more than just the people surveilled.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

“Maybe if we just explain it to them more cogently, they will come to their senses.” This sounds like a Sorkin-esque West Wing perspective on how things work. They are not dimwitted or confused. They can see just fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Haha. No.

Politicians are probably the most short sighted dipshits around.

The sociopathic shitheels that were born into fuck-you money? Sure. Well, not counting morons like Elon, et Al, of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Lmao, that's reading a lot into what I said. Who said anything about explaining anything to them? They don't see the same earth or problems on the earth that we do, and almost nothing is going to change that. Bezos going to space didn't give him that bullshit "Overview Effect" and make him a better person. Musk doing hallucinogens didn't suddenly make him a better person and recognize that other people really exist.

But treating them like they're infallible and just so damn smart when the evidence shows otherwise isn't helping.