this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

Wikipedia

1662 readers
195 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

Also, it's pretty weird that on one hand there seems to be a design standard that's universally considered desirable for a website, and on the other hand, the technology specifically built to make websites didn't allow for that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't like the holy grail layout. I want the whole page to be scrollable.

Just put the menu and items on the top, I'll block the ads so put those wherever, and I'll just scroll down if I ever want to see the footer, which I won't.

I'm here to read the content. Show me a screen full of content.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The holy grail thankfully isn't around much on the modern web. It was very much a product of a time when web browsing always happened on a 4:3 monitor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

There’s so many ways to do it properly these days that it almost feels like they overcorrected.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Where all my OG table users at?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Frames 4 lyfe

[–] DandomRude 5 points 1 week ago

The OG way is still the only universally supported one for e-mail templates. So it's Thug table Life until further notice, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

yo

I only ever did freehand html back in the 90s.. i took a web design class at a comminity college back then and when we got into css I stopped going