this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
-7 points (29.4% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

272 readers
14 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Preface

  1. I am not an economist, and likely another victim of Dunning-Krueger.
  2. This is not an endorsement of the incoming Trump administration's proposed tariff 'plan'.

The Manufacturing Trident

The discourse around tariffs has made it clear that they will raise prices for consumers. Full stop. However, if they were surgically implemented to target nations that US corporations have been strip mining for cheap labor, combined with federal corrections to the minimum wage, and followed by a small business grants program for new US-based manufacturers, it could be the jump start we need.

Tariffs for Labor Protection

For decades, US companies have been taking advantage of the labor force in developing nations. The consequence of this practice that is relevant to this topic is that is has resulted in a race to the bottom to produce the cheapest product possible. Many a frugal consumer will always choose the cheapest option available, so the market for locally produced goods that cost 2-3x as much rapidly evaporated.

Tariffs that raised the cost of these goods to match the price of what domestic manufacturers would be able to compete with could open the door for a new era of American made goods, but uh-oh, prices have gone up so how can anyone afford anything? Let's look at wage corrections.

Federal Minimum Wage Correction

It's no secret that the minimum wage has not kept pace with inflation. In order to implement tariffs, citizens would need to make enough money to afford American goods, so the first step would be correcting the embarrassing federal minimum wage of $7.25/hr, with annual adjustments thereafter to keep pace with inflation. To what extent would the minimum wage need to be raised? I have no clue. Maybe $20/hr? Whether that would be implemented immediately, or with a rev-up period, I will leave to those more educated on that topic than I.

Will raising the minimum wage also increase prices? Almost certainly, but a secret many business don't like to talk about is that while employee wages have not kept up with inflation, the prices of their goods and services certainly have. Since employee wages have not been raised in parity, the business gets a nice little boost to their profit margins each time this cycle takes place, at the direct expense of their labor.

So yes, prices will go up, but I suspect businesses will begrudgingly compete to limit 'sticker-shock' and be forced to cut into their inflated profit margins, restoring a bit of equilibrium.

Federal Grants for Small Manufacturing

Finally, to plant something into this ground we prepared, I would propose a slew of federal grants that would unleash the budding entrepreneurs across our country to go out and build shit. In my fantasy land, this would all be funded by a war chest filled by raising taxes on corporate profits.

The End

Am I an ignorant fool, or does this concept have some merit? Odds are good that it's the former, but it's nice to dream of simple solutions to complex problems. If you made it this far, thanks for joining me for the ride!

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but I suspect

is doing a lot of work here, don't you think?

Consider finding a reputable source that adds some credibility to your view?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It absolutely is. This is more of an extended shower thought that I was hoping to sounding board off this community.

I don't claim to be right, and if I was the onus would be on me to provide the evidence, but I simply wanted to toss an idea around and have holes poked in my arguments.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 2 points 1 month ago

You are right that the tariffs are inflationary. As to whether or not businesses would just accept a hit to their "excess profits" to pay inflated wages is where you need to find research for your specific country. I can tell you though that for every company with "excess profits" there are a couple of smaller ones just scraping by. Not every company would be able to afford inflated wage costs, nor would every customer base accept the increased price in goods and services. In short, it has a choking effect on the most vulnerable companies and creates an environment where the larger ones hoover up competition and create a less competitive environment, which is bad for everyone.