this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
5 points (72.7% liked)

Gaming

2582 readers
282 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A former PlayStation executive suggests we cut game development down because it's too costly for developers and time-consuming for players.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it means dial back pricing, too, I'm for it.

[–] slazer2au 5 points 2 weeks ago

Na, dial back the length so they can churn more out faster at an ever increasing price.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

AAA games are clearly too expensive to be sustainable. Every new big games has so much money behind it that it can't afford to fail, leading to a bunch of highly risk-adverse design decisions. With a few exceptions, players are increasingly having to turn to indie games and AA games for unique experiences because AAA games are getting bland.

I'm not convinced that game length is the main issue though. There's a ton of game mechanic bloat, and far too many games are open world when they would probably be better as a more focused experience. Graphical improvements are also getting increasingly less important, with it getting harder and harder to see new improvements. Switch/indies/AA/etc clearly show that you can have great looking games without spending a huge amount of money on chasing realism in graphics.

[–] Pantsofmagic 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is a terrible fucking idea and he should be ashamed of himself for even thinking it