this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
546 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59776 readers
4692 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As much as I don’t believe bsky will be any different, and won’t join it myself, the momentum is there. Took a little longer than it should have but the tipping point is here and we should all relish in the bird’s passing.

[–] Tyfud 17 points 2 days ago

The bird died years ago. Now we wait for the death of a letter.

[–] alsu2launda 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think bluesky and twitter will become politically divided and become their respective echo chamber rather than Twitter going out of fashion.

Overall the discourse quality will go down at both places.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My bet is that Truth Social buys Twitter in an all-share deal, simultaneously enriching Trump and providing liquidity to Musk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CleoTheWizard 16 points 2 days ago

A lot of people exist on twitter because their favorite celebrity or news cite or company exists on there. The problem is that the lefties and LGBTQ folk create a ton of twitters content and are also a huge majority of those celebrities.

So while I think twitter will become a sort of right wing cesspool, BlueSky will be much different. Especially since BS has the ability to essentially build your own echo chamber on purpose. Which I actually think is fine because some of the echo chambers I’d compare to the instances on here that try to keep people safe and civil like beehaw. But the moment bluesky keeps getting celebs and organizations to make the swap, it’s all over for twitter. There is a critical mass there that will migrate regardless and honestly the echo chamber design means right wing folk would also do well on the platform if they know what they’re doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 52 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I'm glad to see Twitter/X collapsing if only to add to Musk's problems, but at the same time just changing the corporate logo over the outhouse doesn't make it smell any better. It's a better place, but I'm sure it's temporary, the same people/bots/trolls will just migrate right along with the rest of them.

[–] fpslem 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This seems fine, so long as the journos remember how to pull up stakes once a platform decays. I hope they learn a lesson about the importance of owning your own audience, follower lists, etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

/glances at substack

I hope that too. It would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

The difference being that Bluesky has very robust block lists which you can subscribe to to remove these accounts for you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (6 children)

People thought the first Trump presidency was a politically divided time, but maybe we're now entering an even more divided time, given that social media is now fragmenting along political lines, more prominently than it did before.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (7 children)

To call hate speech and harassment "toxicity" downplays both issues.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I rather have a little toxicity than a bunch of overzealous moderators lording over the discourse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Hahaha, they're just now noticing? Rich.

And how will Bkuesky be any different? It won't.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 59 points 2 days ago

You're measuring Bluesky with a different measuring stick than they are.

You're measuring it with the "This is decentralized, and therefore not connected to corporate interests, and never can be" stick.

These journalists WORK FOR the corporate interests you left twitter (or maybe never had an account) over. They are measuring the stick by "These current users are just MAGA users in a cult".

As long as Bluesky doesn't start shifting right wing MAGA, it IS different for their purposes. It's just their purposes are not YOUR purposes, and therefore they can still say that it's different, and not have that be a lie. Doesn't mean it'll satisfy you any.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Bluesky has far more robust tools for blocking bad actors. You can subscribe to auto updating block lists which take these people off your feed.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

the same level of toxicity that I left reddit for seems to be permeating Lemmy, now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not surprising, considering that A) Lemmy is very similar software and B) a lot of the users are former redditors.

Just having downvotes creates toxicity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, like I understand the reason for down votes, bur they are too often abused because the other people don't like your opinion or don't understand your humor

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Maybe the goal is to get Musk to buy Bluesky and start all over again 🤷

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›