it might support earlier rumors claiming the graphics card will retail for nearly $2,000
This is crazy. My 980 ti was expensive considering it sold at $649. The 3090 was $1,499 and the 4090 $1,599 (MSRP).
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
it might support earlier rumors claiming the graphics card will retail for nearly $2,000
This is crazy. My 980 ti was expensive considering it sold at $649. The 3090 was $1,499 and the 4090 $1,599 (MSRP).
People continue to buy it, so they will continue selling it. On top of that, gaming isn't even their biggest market, so we stopped, it wouldn't put a dent into their business.
It's a big shame though
I think Nvidia is poisoning the well with the $2000 rumours so that they're the heroes when it releases at ~$1750
Not an uncommon strategy, I can see this happening for sure
It is no coincidence that the 980 ti was the last top end GPU I purchased from Nvidia. Their greed is out of control and I can't believe a meaningful number of people have gone along with it.
I'm still rocking my 2080 ti and i think i paid just over 1k for it. I won't be buying nvidia again anyway but the prices just put me off so much
I'm still rocking my 1080ti and I paid $140 CAD when the 20 series dropped.
Yeah we have a 1060 3gb in the kids computer chugging along.
They're still perfectly functional. As long as you're happy not having ray tracing, and are willing to settle for not running everything on max gfx, there's no reason to buy a 50, 40 or 30 series. I'm able to play most new games that interest me on medium gfx with no issues.
You're competing with tech companies who want to build GPU data centers now.
Will a separate PSU be needed to power it
A small nuclear plant should be sufficient
Finally a use for the Mr Fusion I got off that old Delorean!
It will require a power cord straight to a 220v outlet.
My next PC will be small, Linux-based (probably NixOS), and focus on power efficiency. AAA gaming more often than not loses to indies, and there is currently a library of games you can play on PC that could never be completed by one person alone anyways that run very well with even modest "modern" specs.
I've been playing Crosscode and it's been such a stellar game, meanwhile titles like S.T.A.L.K.E.R 2 are less feature complete and far more buggy than S.T.A.L.K.E.R Anomaly and GAMMA (which don't require super computers to run, and are free).
The 90 series is always overpriced and inefficient. Tell me about the 80 series.
I wish they hadn't done away with the titan naming. the second the 90 skew was released the titan died, and I feel painting it as just another tier higher of a consumer grade card is disingenuous.