this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
26 points (88.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4135 readers
149 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Since 2019, Natural England has told 74 local planning authorities with polluted rivers that they may not grant permission for new homes unless they were “nutrient neutral.” The Home Builders Federation estimates that the policy blocked the building of more than 160,000 properties.

That's pretty outrageous.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah. Factory farming is causing issues and the solution is to ban building homes?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

According to this article:

housing developments add to the problem with extra wastewater and sewage from new homes as well as run-off from construction sites.

Pretty much everything people do is polluting now and wipes out the fish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, but the current polluters don't have a vested interest in fixing their problem to allow for new housing.

A mandate to require new development to meet a standard on sewage would be more productive than an outright ban.

[–] CheeseNoodle 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

More like the UK government (and every damn government since I've been alive) just hates housebuilding and will come up with any reason to prevent it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I think it's more that NIMBYs hate house building and generally slow the process down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To what end? Just for lols?

[–] CheeseNoodle 2 points 3 weeks ago

Same banality of evil that causes millionares row in New York to mostly just be a bunch of empty skyscrapers. Property makes an excellent investment vehicle and restricting the supply keeps prices high.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What is the issue with building houses where there are high nitrogen levels?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You can prevent it with veganic farming.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just had a look and apparently the problem is that housing developments add to the problem with extra wastewater and sewage from new homes as well as run-off from construction sites.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I know and I'm aware of the massive damage that it does to our waters, I'm just not sure why it's used as an excuse to not build houses in such areas. Does housing add to the problem of nitrates getting into the water or something? So many problems would go away if went organic and banned all fossil fuel derivatives.