Fucking insane.
Hardware
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - [email protected]
- Gaming Laptops - [email protected]
- Laptops - [email protected]
- Linux Hardware - [email protected]
- Mechanical Keyboards - [email protected]
- Microcontrollers - [email protected]
- Monitors - [email protected]
- Raspberry Pi - [email protected]
- Retro Computing - [email protected]
- Single Board Computers - [email protected]
- Virtual Reality - [email protected]
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
To be fair, the 1.6 nm is a label that has absolutely nothing to do with the feature size.
As the article says, 1.6 is the same as the last process but with backside power delivery.
It's weird that Intel got grief for 14, then 14+, then 14+++ but TMSC does the same thing, lies in their marketing by calling it 1.6, and everyone is happy.
Yea, it’s marketing jargon for sure. My comment still stands, because this technology is amazing.
Yeah it's amazing. But it is how funny no one called Intel 14++ amazing despite doing the same as TMSC is doing now, plus not lying.