this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
11 points (82.4% liked)

PCGaming

6521 readers
163 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunchingWood 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

His review is certainly most accurate.

I only played like an hour and I encountered so many of the issues he mentioned in his review, on top of crashing to desktop when I first fired a gun in the open world. It also runs absolutely abysmal on high-end hardware, reminds me a lot of Starfield's debacle.

I had hoped the gargantuan day one patch would've fixed some things. But I have no idea what it did.

It's quite baffling how this game got 81% rating on Steam right now. If it were EA or Ubisoft this would've been an Overwhelmingly Negative game for sure. There also were like thousands of positive reviews barely minutes after launch.

Game needs at least several months more in the oven, and then I doubt it would be all fixed still. I wouldn't rate this beyond a 5/10 in its current state.