How on earth is this fuckhead still employed in this position?
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
217 points (97.4% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2639 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
i came here to ask this. really-- what does it take to fire this a-hole?
Appointing people who want to replace him to the USPS board of governors.
In other words, he's still there because Biden doesn't really want him gone. Biden has had enough opportunities to appoint people who would oppose DeJoy, but appointed ones who support him instead.
My theory; he was put in position to try to influence the postal vote element of that election. Once his threat was neutralised, resources & attention were diverted elsewhere, as removing him would consume political capital best spent on more urgent / dangerous problems.
Why the fuck is he still employed in government? Why does the president not have the power to remove him in an instant
I don't think the president has the ability to fire the postmaster general.
Not directly but he does have the power to appoint the board of directors who have the power to remove the postmaster general. Or at least that's my understanding of how it works.
And why is that? He can fire any other General. Attorney General, Surgeon General, etc
Might I suggest defenestration? It's super effective.
I thought the Czech have a patent on that?
I mean trump did appoint dejoy to that position so Biden should be able remove him.
Trump didn't appoint DeJoy, but he did appoint the entire board of governors who appointed DeJoy. The board was technically bipartisan, as well.
Something else to note, there were independent bodies tasked with coming up with a list of names for the appointment of Postmaster General. DeJoy wasn't on any of them.
The postal service is 100% self funded due to republicans who can't or won't understand the concept of a public service.
Why the fuck is any of this political anymore?
They are only changing 5% rather than the 62% they promised.
Oh I'm not being obtuse I understand the problem, I just think if USPS is 100% self funded then it should just be a private company.
I speak from ignorance though, is there any benefit to being subject to this political fuckery?
Fire him!
For fucks sakes, if we had a Republican president and the postmaster was appointed by a Democrat to politicize the department, they would have fired him on Day One. But once again, Democrats are too goddamn spineless to go after their political enemies.
It's clear the democrats want him to stay, otherwise he'd be gone. The democrats want the political benefits of keeping their rich bosses happy, while being able to claim they're not just another party of the rich.
Oh look everybody, we got another one of those "but, but, but both parties are the same" types over here.
I never said that, because it's not true
This guy is a Damm goblin that wants the organization he works for to disappear. His existence is an insult to society.
Why is DeJerk still there? He should have been catapulted into the sun the minute Biden took office.
This tool was put in place to bankrupt the postal service by making them self fund the pension plan
This does not inspire confidence.