this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
287 points (95.3% liked)

US Authoritarianism

823 readers
5 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
287
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by alphanerd4 to c/usauthoritarianism
 

Like, no seriously, the state department classified him as a terrorist until like 10 years before he died. He was already a beloved figure In his modern incarnation as we remember him now way, Way way before The US federal government ever accepted that he had actually just won and was not a terrorist anymore, but a statesman.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unpopular take but I think both Nelson Mandela was a terrorist and that terrorism isn't necessarily a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah terrorism comes in many shapes and sizes. And recently there is a trend in calling anything that targets the interests of rich people terrorism.

Terrorism against private jets = cool and trendy

Terrorism against random people in public = very unfriendly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Ones persons terrorist is another persons revolutionary

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Freedom fighter/terrorist dichotomy aside, he definitely used terror to achieve political goals. We look upon him kindly because his cause seems just to us, and because he won.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Choosing peace instead of genocide when he had his hand on the button helped as well

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Great point.

[–] gofsckyourself 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you have to post a full uncropped phone-length screenshot of a poor quality of this instead of spending literally a few seconds to find a better quality version?

[–] alphanerd4 -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well no, it saved less than a minute, and ya I agree that would usually mean less engagement, but fascinatingly by pointing it out and making that criticism real it adds complexity to the post and actually increases engagement.

[–] gofsckyourself 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you a YouTube algorithm? Why does "increasing engagement" matter more to you than the quality of the content you share?

[–] SkunkWorkz 3 points 1 week ago

but mUh eNgAGEmNt

[–] aaa999 1 points 1 week ago

caitlyn johnstone