this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
252 points (98.5% liked)

Firefox

17301 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Now that Google isn’t allowed to pay them default search engine money, I think this was expected.

Ideologically I think it’s a good thing the US government is challenging Google’s monopolistic practices. Unfortunately, that money was a massive percentage of Mozilla’s income.

It really was short-sighted of them to put so many eggs into one basket.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Mozilla frankly could use some serious restructuring. If Brave was able to get a decent market share overnight surely a well known company can make a come back.

Mozilla has a management problem

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hear hear. Trim the fat, and start at the head.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Looks at ladybug

We will watch your career with great interest

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Brave didn't build a browser. They reskinned Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Brave has a notable market share? I've never seen them in any graph.

Comparing the two is also a difficult territory, because Brave does not develop their own browser engine. If Google stops publishing the Chromium source code, they're gone in a few months.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

This is the Mozilla foundation, not the Mozilla corp. The latter has the deal with Google; the former couldn't make that deal even if they wanted to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Google hasn't been forbidden from paying Mozilla - yet, at least. They've only been ruled a monopolist, but what consequences they will face is yet to be determined, and then the appeals process will follow, so it'll be a couple of years before there's any potential impact.

Mozilla has also explicitly tried to have other baskets to put eggs in (Relay. VPN, Monitor Plus, Hubs, etc.), it's just that none of those have been as successful.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the idea of putting people before profit feels increasingly radical

What. The. Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably because of the ad corp they bought

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Nah it's not news that their ethos has been fading away for a long time now and that Mozilla just really isn't what it used to be a decade ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the Mozilla Foundation. They're legally a non-profit, so this isn't supposed to mean that they're reconsidering their stance. They can't do that. It's rather just them saying "shit's hard, yo".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The wikimedia foundation as a nice fraction of a billion dollars in stocks in order to not rely on donations

[–] WhatAmLemmy 4 points 1 week ago

Yes but the for-profit Mozilla corporation will selfishly maintain control of the golden goose to the bitter end, even if they destroy it. They offer no value without Firefox and they know it.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago

The CEO salary will also get a 30% cut right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

Those are job postings at the for-profit Mozilla Corporation, the layoffs happened at the non-profit Mozilla Foundation.

They're theoretically connected, in that the Corporation is a subsidiary of the Foundation, but to my knowledge, they practically don't hand money from the Foundation to the Corporation, because the Corporation has magnitudes more money anyways.

[–] gedaliyah 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel bad for the people who were eliminated. The browser has been stagnating for a while now, maybe a smaller team can be more focused on making a better, more modern browser.

The mobile browser is top notch. The desktop browser has been slowly catching up with the basic innovations of other browsers.

They definitely need to find a new source of funding.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They need to stop bloating the web, so that browser development stops taking billion dollar budgets.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure, Google is at the forefront of that endeavor. Apple has no interest in keeping up. And Mozilla needs to stay in the talks for whatever Google proposes to ensure the webstandard can be implemented by others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

History questions: which company invented JavaScript?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Netscape. Specifically the homophobe guy that's now leading the Chromium-based browser Brave.

I'm being a jackass about it, because that was 28 years ago. You can't say they should stop bloating the web and then bring up an example from before Google even existed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They need another source of funding, maybe cutting salaries of the Cs would work for one.

I don't think this is them focussing back on the browser, especially looking at the job listings posted in another comment. It seems to me it's just a focus on AI, probably in the hope of making money.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're gonna end up with a Blink monopoly, aren't we?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Either you die young or you live long enough to turn into the Blink engine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, I definitely won't stop donating, if they're this short on money, but that was basically my understanding of what they do, primarily advocacy.

Is MDN and the webstandards work also part of the Foundation? It certainly feels like it'd be more non-profit-y work. I guess, they do hold ownership of the Corporation, so they could also just tell the Corporation to deliver that.

But yeah, I'd like some increased messaging of what other work they do, or how much advocacy they can continue to do. Obviously, that's not an insane number of employees left either way...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I believe MDN and standards partcipation is part of the Corporation. The latter definitely, because implementation experience matters for that. The former also has its own monetisation, and has a lot of content contributed by the Open Web Docs foundation.