this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
76 points (89.6% liked)

Technology

59607 readers
3417 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randomaccount43543 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copying here this caution comment from a user on Reddit:

Non-peer reviewed, non-replicated, rushed-looking preprint, on a topic with a long history of controversy and retractions. So don't get excited yet.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, huge grain of salt required.

But would be absolutely huge if true, and the recipe in the materials and methods is trivial. Both in equipment and materials. So someone else will try this soon, if people aren't already trying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Oh I bet there are several labs that are already on it :)

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So I read the paper. Here’s a tldr about how their material apparently gains its properties.

It is hypothesized that superconductivity properties emerge from very specific strains induced in the material. Hence why most of the discovered superconductors require either to be cooled down to very low temperatures, or to be under high pressure. Both shrink the material.

What this paper claims is that they have achieved a similar effect chemically by replacing some lead ions with copper ions, which are a bit smaller (87 pm for Cu vs 133 pm for Pb). This shrinks the material by 0.48%, and that added strain induces superconductivity. This is why it apparently works at room temperature — you no longer need high pressures or extreme cold to create the needed deformation.

Can’t really comment on how actually feasible or long-lasting this effect is, but it looks surprisingly promising. At least as a starting point for future experiments. Can’t wait for other labs’ reproduction attempts. If it turns out to be true, this is an extremely important and world-changing discovery.

Fingers crossed :)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s super cool! Hopefully it can be confirmed in other labs soon.

Then the next big hurdle will be figuring out a way to mass produce it in a cost-effective manner.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

What's very cool is that the recipe in the paper is trivial. It's just lead, phosphorus, and copper, fired in a kiln under a vacuum. With a couple hundred dollars of equipment, one could even attempt to make this at home (wouldn't recommend with the powdered lead tho).

So if the claim holds up true, mass producing it should be quick.

That said, the lead makes this material not fit for use for a lot of applications due to its toxicity.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, it’s room temperature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lol, you got me there :P

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The heat capacity results indicated that the new model is suitable for explaining the superconductivity of LK-99. The unique structure of LK-99 that allows the minute distorted structure to be maintained in the interfaces is the most important factor that LK-99 maintains and exhibits superconductivity at room temperatures and ambient pressure.

If true, that would have world-changing implications. I tried looking, but didn't see a paper to go with it or a second lab to confirm it. Still, very cool and hopefully will be confirmed.

[–] ViridianNott 5 points 1 year ago

Very true that it needs to be confirmed, but worth mentioning that every paper in history was at one point or another unreviewed and uncooborated. The fact that this isn’t yet doesn’t inherently mean anything bad for the quality of the results.

I’m just a biologist so I can’t weigh in to the credibility of the paper beyond that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Big, if true.

[–] ArchmageAzor 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when science Youtubers start making videos on it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There already is a youtube video of the purported Meissner effect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtVjGWpbE7k

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=EtVjGWpbE7k

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And this is a piece magnetically levitating. Could still be faked, but this is more than the usual "after massaging the numbers there's a trace of a barely discernible effect" stuff that you usually find in faked or otherwise misinterpreted results.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If at all true this would be world-changing news.

[–] Hazdaz 4 points 1 year ago

Let's see other researchers replicate this. People can be hopeful amd even excited, but we need to be leery of unverified claims.

I am super glad this isn't out of China because I'd be already dismissing it.

load more comments
view more: next ›