Anyone else find it slightly annoying that the main picture Fortune chose for this article is a 2005 dime?
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
33 points (92.3% liked)
Economy
484 readers
206 users here now
Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Extremely annoying.
1975? Not even silver...
I'll never understand why anyone would spend half a million on a dime with no s.
That's about 4.38% annual return over 40 years. Not terrible, but could have done better investing in something else.
EDIT: The brother paid $18,200 for the dime. But my original number of 4.38% was off because I used the inflation adjusted $90k cost. More accurate number is 8.64%.
I think your math is a bit off. It's more like 56.3% annually over 50 years
My numbers are off, but I think you missed the part where they paid $18,200 for it. I had used the inflation-adjusted $90k previously. Using $18,200, the ROI is 8.64% - which isn't too bad.