this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
613 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5623 readers
3582 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: replaced the original blurry tweet with a more legible version, remade by @[email protected]!

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gofsckyourself 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remade this meme to make it more legible

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So much better!

(I replaced the post image and credited you. Thanks!)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

I just sat here going back and forth between the images looking for the difference. This would explain why I didn't find one

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why Mew got them little T-Rex arms?

[–] subtext 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean if you can do literally fuckin’ everything with just psychic powers why would you need anything more than T-Rex arms

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why T-Rex got them little Mew arms?

[–] scrollo 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You activated my sleeper phrase. I am awake now.

[–] SmackemWittadic 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

T-rex unfortunately ain't a psychic type as far as I know

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Alakazam has those nice long arms so he can eat his cereal

[–] pyre 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think we have a way of measuring whether any dinosaur was psychic or not.

[–] SmackemWittadic 3 points 1 day ago

Fair point, they could have all had psychic moves and we'll never know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Because normal armed T-Rexes just sat around jacking off all day and refused to go get a girlfriend. Thus they were bred out of existence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because, as the first Pokemon and basis of all others, it's a Pokemon baby/embryo/2001: A Space Odyssey reference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If that helps you

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Char? Immediate upvote.

[–] Maultasche 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting, that the translators decided to switch the argument roles for Mew and Mewtwo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Explain yourself. There are versions where Mew isn't just a vibing space cat and/or cosmic embryo?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh yes.

In the original Japanese version of the movie, Mewtwo is less of a "destroy the world" villain and Mew is less of of an innocent that shows up to save the day.

It's not quite as big a flip as the person above is suggesting, but it is absolutely more gray.

Basically, Mewtwo is depicted as deeply confused and trying to justify its existence by proving that it and the other clones are superior. It's not out to destroy anything, he just wants to prove he deserves to exist.

Meanwhile, Mew is actually kind of a purist, claiming the clones are just fakes and don't deserve to exist. It definitely starts the movie as a vibing space cat, but once it encounters the clones, it instigates the battle as much as Mewtwo does.

I could get into it but this article does a good job summarizing it.

https://www.denofgeek.com/culture/how-the-us-version-of-pokemon-the-first-movie-changed-its-meaning/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would argue the chauvinism that they both display makes them both solidly in the wrong.

Very much a commentary on war and an argument for anti-imperalism I'd say.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's actually a pretty great plot. And, just like how in that story no side is necessarily the "good" guys, he says it got changed because the "multiethnic audience" of America wouldn't have liked it, because I very, very much doubt the American marketing team that simplified it would say that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Brother my brother
tell me what are we fighting for
Isn't life just so much more?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

that's me with Mimi