this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

science

14984 readers
683 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AlphaFold predicted that three sperm proteins work together to form a complex. Two of these proteins were previously known to be important for fertility. Pauli and her colleagues then confirmed that the third is also critical for fertility in both zebrafish and mice, and that the three proteins interact with one another.

The team also found that, in zebrafish, the trio creates a place for an egg protein to bind, providing a mechanism by which the two cells could recognize one another. “It’s a way to say, ‘Sperm, you found an egg’ and ‘Egg, you found a sperm’,” says Andreas Blaha, a biochemist at the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology and co-author of the paper.

The findings might one day yield a way to screen people struggling with infertility, to find out whether problems with this complex could be the cause, says Wright.

And the results highlight a role for AlphaFold in studying fertilisation, he adds. “We’re limited in terms of experiments,” he says. “It might be that these modelling studies have an important role to play in the future.”

In other words, the team used AlphaFold to help with discovering a three-protein complex that allows sperm & egg to bind together. And this complex seems to be conserved between zebrafish and humans (!!). Despite the news title: this study is actually less about AlphaFold and more about using it to help do very important biochemistry

Original paper (open access): A conserved fertilization complex bridges sperm and egg in vertebrates. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.035

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] zlatiah 3 points 2 months ago

Hehe

Blame the Nature News editor for this, the paper title wasn't horny at all

[–] NicolaHaskell 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

To be honest, I'd prefer if all "serious" journalism would be constantly horny rather than just clickbaity.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Peeping Tom scientists -- have you no shame!

[–] NicolaHaskell 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's the "intimate detail"? The novelty I got here was the revelation of three instead of two proteins involved in this binding site. Is that "the" binding between the egg and sperm or is it a secondary/support linkage?

[–] zlatiah 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the "intimate detail" is just the editor being horny... I didn't make the title don't blame me

[–] NicolaHaskell 2 points 2 months ago

I'm not blaming, I don't think the reporting is horny either. The concept is fascinating, if anything I'm horny for more of a middle ground between fluff and the original paper.

[–] ieatpwns 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So like wingmen?

[–] WormFood 0 points 2 months ago

alphafold had set the field of protein folding back a decade