this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
207 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19056 readers
3894 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saltesc 2 points 4 hours ago

TIL Americans spell cancelling with one L.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Certainly nice that Biden has come around to enforcing the full provisions of the original 1994 law granting public service workers loan forgiveness (which was then amended several times under Bush and Obama). But the headline seems to suggest he's personally responsible for these loan cancellations, when he's simply no longer trying to tie the loan forgiveness up in bureaucracy like under prior administrations.

Incidentally, a big overhaul of the student loan forgiveness program was advanced back in 2021, when Democrats had full control of both branches of Congress. But it was killed in a pair of Democrat controlled committees under VA-3's Robert C. Scott and MA-1's Richard Neals.

[–] BMTea 7 points 10 hours ago

A necessary comment like this would never make it in the awful Reddit version of this sub. This place feels like the real Reddit I used to use before 2016.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty disingenuous to suggest that the Biden Administration hasn't been working hard to cut through the bullshit red tape those previous administrations created to erase this debt.

They took it to the goddamn Supreme Court. The Biden Administration. I know that wasn't for PSLF specifically, but they're inextricably related.

And then to blame Biden for the votes of two no name reps?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 9 hours ago

Biden Administration hasn’t been working hard to cut through the bullshit red tape those previous administrations

In several cases, he's been contributing to it. Biden has routinely promised reform through paths he knew in advance to be dead-ends - fighting pitched battles in court and advocating hopeless charges through the legislature. Meanwhile, he left more straightforward paths to debt forgiveness underutilized. Specifically, the provisions within the 1965 Higher Education Act grants a presidential administration, via the Education Secretary, authority to "enforce, pay, compromise, waive, or release" government-held federal student loans. The Higher Education Act provided the authority for President Donald Trump and Biden to pause student loan debt payments during the coronavirus pandemic.

They took it to the goddamn Supreme Court.

They could have simply struck the debt from the record and allowed Republicans to try and reinstate it. Instead, Biden's bureaucrats dragged their heels, allowing the Fifth Circuit to predictably hold up the decision and the six-vote SCOTUS to quash their efforts.

And then to blame Biden for the votes of two no name reps?

Two committee chairmen. One of whom was the head of the Ways and Means Committee, second only to Appropriations as the most influential committee in the House.

[–] Makeitstop 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

The coverage is infuriating. It would be like having headlines about Biden sending checks out to millions of households (and media like Fox News calling it an expensive handout) when tax refunds start going out every year.

We shouldn't be treating it as special and noteworthy when the executive branch faithfully executes the laws. Instead, we should be focusing on how fucked up it is that the previous administration ignored the law and its constitutional duty in order to pointlessly screw over people.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 6 points 13 hours ago

We shouldn’t be treating it as special and noteworthy when the executive branch faithfully executes the laws.

"Biden reverses out Trump policy of denying claims under the Public Direct Loans Act" would have made for a far more accurate, more compelling, and more politically engaging headline. Sadly, we're going to pretend he's just doing a Debt Jubilee out of the goodness of his heart, rather than fulfilling the terms of the contract that lenders agreed to when they took lower-paying public sector jobs for 5-10 years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

. It would be like having headlines about Biden sending checks out to millions of households (and media like Fox News calling it an expensive handout) when tax refunds start going out every year.

It is not like this at all. Please educate yourself on this topic. If you actually give a shit.

[–] Makeitstop 1 points 8 hours ago

Your comment contributes nothing of value.

Why should I give more of a shit about your argument than you do? You can't be bothered to explain what your assertion is, but I'm supposed to go "educate" myself? Even if it was reasonable for me to drop everything to go do research on a topic to figure out what your point is supposed to be, there's no way for me to ever know that I found the specific thing you're talking about.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 14 hours ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/student-loan-cancellation-forgiveness-debt-774b0ee69f911f68f646a066031ee604
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support