this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
58 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19078 readers
5574 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
58
Freedom To Vote Act: Pros, Cons, And Impact On U.S. Elections (ace-usa.org)
submitted 1 month ago by unitymatters to c/politics
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Freedom to Vote Act could dramatically change U.S. elections, from expanding early voting and voter registration to reforming campaign finance and tackling gerrymandering. But is it a necessary step to protect voting rights, or does it give too much power to the federal government? This article breaks down the key provisions and the heated debate surrounding the bill. What do you think? https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-votingrights/freedom-to-vote-act-pros-cons-and-impact-on-u-s-elections/

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cris_Color 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The policy seems like a net win, and the downsides seem like they could be addressed.

Interesting to hear early voting decreases voter turnout, I'll have to go look into that and see if there wasa a hypothesis as to why. That seems really odd to me

Edit: the conclusions drawn in the first linked article point mostly to the circumstances of the election rather than the implementation of early voting as a reason for the lack of a substantial increase in voter turnout. The second article is not available to the public but in part of what is publicly available, it suggests that the implementation of early voting alone isn't going to increase voter turnout, which kinda suggests their findings are more complicated than just "early voting decreases voter turnout". The conclusion in the linked blog post seems to be oversimplifying and slightly misstating the research from what I can tell, but the research is super interesting anyway

Link to first study "by an American university" (super odd way to contextualize the research 😅) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5A1lFQvBa-iMzJmOWI0OGItMTRlZi00MjQwLTk4YzEtY2QxY2Q3NjEzZmZk/view?resourcekey=0--JUfo8uwxWjoDYG8yKyoFQ

Link to the second study, not available to the public. I didn't try like research gate or anything like that though https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajps.12063

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd speculate that "today isn't a good day for me to vote" is simply an uncommon reason for people not voting. Probably more common are things like:

  • "My vote doesn't matter"
  • "I can't wait in a line for hours"
  • "My polling place is too far"
[–] Cris_Color 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't early voting make the line shorter and give you more flexibility in polling location? (I don't actually know, I've not voted early before)

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 1 points 4 weeks ago

In general I'm sure it helps wait times but I've seen there be waves of voters at polling places. People may try to go during lunch or just after work so some times of day can have a really long line. I've done it before where I've just driven by, seen 50 people waiting in the hot sun, and I came back later. That was in elections long gone where I wasn't genuinely freaked out about the wrong side winning. This year I'm not turning around and I'll wait hours to cast my vote if that's what it takes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I would easily trade this with a law overturning citizens united and making it clear rights are for living, breathing, citizens and not logical entities. That being said this still mostly seems good but I would like some detail like " establish a standardized vote-by-mail system for all eligible voters" as my state has a pretty nice system and I would hate for it to be made worse like if they for some reason did not allow the multi envelope setup.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 1 month ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support