They used computer analysis and past employees to construct an evidence based comparison.
Not sure what the sarcastic “Look!” was related to. They need to try to present facts above the fold
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)
politics
17 readers
1 users here now
About Community
Community dedicated to U.S. Politics on the Fediverse.
Rules
-
Civil discussions: Hate speech, personal attacks, and flaming or baiting people into uncivil behavior is prohibited.
-
Code Of Conduct: Respect leminal.space (Instance this community is on) and lemmy's sitewide code of conduct
-
No Spams: Post and comment spamming is prohibited. Spammers will be banned at the earliest.
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
The look was they're finally doing it. Have you not noticed that? They pointed it out in the article. The New York Times has noticeably treated Donald Trump with kid gloves. I don't know anyone who's not familiar with that critique.
Not sure a day has gone by without a (deserved) critical opinion piece in the NYT in the past 2 months. Not looking to defend anyone but the level of outrage in the public doesn’t need to be matched in headlines. That’s what Fox News does.
Nobody's talking about opinion pieces here. We're talking about news. Opinion pieces are not news. They are opinion pieces. The reason they're upset is that their news division is covering up actual news events for dubious reasons.
This better be the most extensively documented, recorded, well guarded and surveiled election in US history. It's going to have to be if democracy is to survive.
The enemy will be far better organized this time. We are going to see ratfuckery on a level never seen before in the US.