this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
242 points (95.8% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1174 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess if you include the territory that was very briefly held when Russia was making a push into Kyev, that's true, but the lines in the East have held pretty steady since the early days of the war.

Short of bringing US-style air superiority to play there, I can't see that they'll gain much in the near term.

[–] ForgetReddit 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the play needs to be a stalemate/slow advance until Putin dies. His successor will either accelerate or withdraw imo. Can’t bleed resources like that forever and remain in power, Putin is grandfathered in but the new guy won’t be. Unfortunately Putin could die tomorrow or in ten years. Hopefully it’s sooner than later.

[–] 1bluepixel 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

50% since Russia's gains early in the war, and most of it in late 2022 during the first counter-offensive.

They have NOT been making major gains during the current counter-offensive, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The hardest part of the counteroffensive is the first part, they're pushing into the most heavily defended and fortified territory held by Russia. It will obviously be slow going, until eventually they break through and progress will happen more rapidly after that.

[–] anewbeginning 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That was never going to happen. The lines have to strongly defended. But it is no assurance of defeat. It only increases the expense and time to recover. And once Ukrainians have some air force capabilities their combined arms offensive capabilities will be much greater.

[–] lemmyshmemmy -3 points 1 year ago

I thought they'd been training on F-16s since last summer. Disappointing to see that moving so slowly

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Give em F-16s, Blinken! They are designed to kill MiGs, and will provide much needed air support!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

F16's won't give Ukraine much of an advantage until sufficient numbers of pilots are a trained. There are two weapons that could immediately change the battlefield landscape. GLSDB's and ATACM's are long range precision bombs that would allow Ukraine to target Russian supply lines and ammunition stores far behind the front lines, including into Crimea. They both have backup inertial guidance systems in order to mitigate GPS jamming.. which is a big problem for their current guided munitions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The problem with F-16's is that when they're inevitably shot down, the videos will be all over the net and it will look awful from a spend perspective.