this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34889 readers
41 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Once again ordinary people in the West are saved from affordable, low-pollution living, and Western companies are saved from having to compete.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

That's catchy, but not entirely true.

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards... it's not like there's a fair market EU companies can compete in without some sort of handicap.

PS: Yes, "western" countries have been playing along with China's deliberate long term strategy with full awareness of where it would lead, but that's another story that is both much older and has a much broader scope than the EV industry.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general), plus they have cheaper environmental and labour standards… it’s not like there’s a fair market EU companies can compete in without some sort of handicap.

Hah. Volkswagen is in trouble right now because they fucked up the transition to electric cars completly. What do you think will happen now? That's right, we the (German) people will have to save them now, with our money. Basically the same shit as a subsidy, just later in the process. Kinda like what the Chinese do, just the really stupid way.

Oh, and of course, it will be everybody's fault but their own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I wish they had an eGolf comparable to the Bolt and the Leaf.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

China heavily subsidizes EV manufacturers (and production in general)

And that's a bad thing? Any sensible government is going to subsidise renewable energy and electric vehicles. It makes both economic and environmental sense. Anyone not doing this is an idiot and a climate terrorist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Subsidizing sales of EVs (ie. I pay for my neighbor's new EV because I want cleaner air) does make environmental sense.

Subsidizing production does not have the same positive environmental impact, mainly because factories in China pollute more than factories, say, in the EU (due to different environmental laws), but also because moving finished products from China to the "west" obviously pollutes more than moving just those components that would need to be sourced from China anyways (eg. batteries).

As for the "makes economic sense" part... IDK: I guess that mainly depend on your political stance.
Personally, I don't like that both sales and production subsidies have the effect of moving money from the poor to the rich, but other people may focus on different effects (eg. more production = more jobs) and support subsides.
In case you wonder: my take is that, instead of incentivizing adoption and production of EVs, one should disincentivize internal combustion vehicles by adding taxes to them (which, in a sense, aren't really taxes but just charging for the very real environmental costs society as a whole will have to pay for your shiny SUV).

Anyone not doing this is an idiot and a climate terrorist.

You should really think twice before spewing judgements... and also avoid misusing words like "terrorist" because, when misused this way, it only conveys that you don't like someone, dulling your message instead of strengthening it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Subsidizing production does not … from China anyways (eg. batteries).

I'm asking why the EU isn't subsudising their domestic EV industry and starting a competition in electric propulsion technology. That would benefit everyone, except maybe the oil lobby.

one should disincentivize internal combustion vehicles by adding taxes to them

Why not both? And preferrably better subsidies for public transport / cycles / footpaths, etc.

avoid misusing words like "terrorist" because, when misused this way

If killing a handful of people is terrorism, what would you call trying to kill the entire human race (along with thousands of random other species)? 'Terrorist' is, if anything, too mild a word to describe such filth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buzz86us 5 points 1 month ago

It is massively clownish though because as the barrier to entry goes up higher everyone will just switch to micromobility which is built mostly by the Chinese

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is this the famous "invisible hand of the market"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Is your argument pro market regulation or against market regulation or just there to stir up shit?

The EU is a heavily regulated market economy. Broadly that creates better outcomes and higher levels of happiness for its citizens.

[–] PixellatedDave 1 points 1 month ago
[–] cordlessmodem 34 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Competition is good! Unless it makes shareholders sad.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] buzz86us 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Politicians be like

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yay, no punishment for the european brands. What they were doing, slept?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Germany is upset about this because they sell cars to China. This will probable create Chinese counter tariffs on European cars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

because they sell cars to China

For how much longer? Can German cars even still compete with the Chinese, or has that ship sailed already? Come, buy the best engineering of yesteryear! Yay!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I assume this doesn't apply to Chinese parts used to manufacturer electric cars in the EU

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

@geneva_convenience It's exactly the same that also happened several years ago between the US and the EU concerning civil planes. Here Boeing and Airbus compete against each other - and the US had the assumption, that the EU subsidized Airbus so that Boeing couldn't compete. Because of that the US thought about tariffs that would have countered this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

oh yeah, the land of "free market" ...

PS: Stolen land

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Has the EU "champoined" free markets? I assumed that was more of a US buxzword.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The European commision sure wanted TTIP to happen, so there's that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Great news for EU auto workers!

load more comments
view more: next ›