Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!
Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.
Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]
Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]
Photos of the past should go to [email protected]
it is I, cheese-grater face!
Show some respect. He's the gratest warrior from our town.
With a shield that small I feel like he will parry anything I throw at him
That's not a shield. That's the dish he serves revenge on.
Those shoes look darn comfy
The rest of the outfit not so much
Looks like they're basically moccasins. Comfy in the right context but basically no support. They would need replaced frequently too...often enough that I wouldn't be surprised if common people did repairs themselves.
How would one penetrate those defenses? Theoretically you can pierce his armor by thrusting your weapon into one of the crevices between plates, but actually doing that while he’s chopping at your head and blocking with a shield sounds damned near impossible. This guy looks basically invincible to anything other than heavy bludgeoning weapons, and pretty well protected from those too.
I would think you'd focus on simple impact. Armor doesn't fully protect against that, so if you hit hard enough with a sword, it's still going to hurt like hell, maybe cause serious injury.
Like how bullet-resistant vests work. Depending on the tech in the vest (and the round), you're still getting injured - perhaps enough to keep you out of the fight.
A good example is modern helmets (both motorcycle and bicycle). I got a concussion while wearing each of them. They kept me from having a more serious brain injury or even death. And my helmets work far better than what this guy is wearing.
This soldier getting hit in the head is still going to feel it, maybe even knock him out or kill him.
A big part of Roman gladiator games was the show and the contrast - most likely, a Crupellarius, as a heavy gladiator, would have been paired against an unarmored Retiarius, with a trident and a net. The tactic of a Retiarius against other heavy gladiators was to evade and exhaust them before binding/tangling them and 'finishing' them, whether by bringing them to a surrender or wounding them. One imagines a similar tactic would be employed against this heavy bastard.
But even if no serious wounds are inflicted, the fight is what matters - you have to give the crowd a show, and everything else is secondary!
