this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
17 points (87.0% liked)

Hacker News

482 readers
387 users here now

RSS Feed of HackerNews

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 4 months ago

Freeze peaches (depending)

[–] MsPenguinette 1 points 4 months ago

People linking to photos of Hunter’s massive hog while partying with hookers is okay but a boring ass document that isn’t going to change a single vote is a step too far?

[–] CodexArcanum 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For those avoiding the orange site and the musk, but somehow seeing this, here is the link too spicy for Twitter to handle: https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/read-the-jd-vance-dossier

[–] Serinus 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I don't know about some of the claims in the accompanying article.

Unlike the Steele Dossier, which was both fraudulent and discredited

I know not everything is proven in the Steele Dossier, but has there been a single thing shown to be false?

I'll believe the Vance Dossier stuff when it's verified elsewhere. Until then, it's not worth reading a PDF straight from Iran. (Unless you're someone who is going to immediately, independently verify things found in the document.)