this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
123 points (99.2% liked)

Economics

444 readers
27 users here now

founded 1 year ago
 

Boeing said Monday it made a “best and final offer” to striking machinists that includes bigger raises and larger bonuses, but the workers’ union said the proposal isn’t good enough and there won’t be a ratification vote before Boeing’s deadline at the end of the week.

The union complained that Boeing publicized its latest offer to 33,000 striking workers without first bargaining with union negotiators.

“Boeing does not get to decide when or if you vote,” leaders of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers district 751 told members Monday night. “The company has refused to meet for further discussion; therefore, we will not be voting” on Friday, as Boeing insisted.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The strikers face their own financial pressure to return to work. They received their final paychecks last week and will lose company-provided health insurance at the end of the month, according to Boeing.

"Land of the free", my ass. You can't be free if you don't have healthcare and a living wage.

This country is a joke.

[–] grue 18 points 1 month ago

And thus the real reason so many politicians opposed single-payer healthcare is revealed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Until we get all human basics guaranteed to everyone (housing, food, healthcare, water, internet, sewage, trash, electricity, heating and cooling depending on location, etc.) along with a UBI and all large corporations being converted into worker-owned coops, then people will continue to have the "freedom" to live in poverty and/or be subjugated to subpar working conditions.

Or in other words, make it so having a job is optional if those people don't mind living with the bare minimum essentials, and for those who do choose to work for extra, their jobs will have fair working conditions and fair compensation, as the company will be run democraticly. Imagine being able to elect and fire your managers.

And it's not like the US can't pay for it. Even ignoring Modern Monetary Theory (which absolutely applies), we could easilly stop giving tax breaks to the rich, close tax loopholes that the wealthy take advantage of, cut the extremely overinflated military budget, nationalize Big Pharma and hospitals as part of a push towards national healthcare (which would eliminate price gouging for pharmaceuticals and hospital visits for the government's single payer insurance), and stop giving bailouts to Wall St. and corporations every time they fuck up. This would give the US enough money to pay for any damn social services it wants to.

Also ban all private money from politics, change the voting system to something that is more representative, eliminate gerrymandering and the electoral college, etc.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

Man, fuck Boeing. I'm not even tangentially involved in things, but they've been shitty as hell during this entire process. This lousy attempt at an end run is par for the course.

[–] mkwt 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Makes sense to me. The union leadership got seriously burned on the previous offer that they backed. They're clearly not going to come back to their members with something that's basically the same, but some numbers tweaked.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

"Executive leadership" can suck it.