this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
498 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32453 readers
1368 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

Hey boss, I'm logging this ticket as tech debt. We need to take this on to hit our marketing deadline, and as soon as the project is over we need two scrum cycles to resolve it.

Two years later...

This ticket has been open forever, can we just delete it since nobody is ever going to clean this up? It's messing up our velocity metric.

[–] kautau 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As long as "cleaner than you found it" also includes "better documented." I've worked with people who think that "the code should speak for itself" to the point that they will make biased decisions with no explanation or documentation and then if you ask them about it after their response is "look at the PR for how that decision was made." I'm not going to git blame and find your PR to find an outcome from an argument between two people that after scrolling just says "sometimes the API returns a JSON string here instead of nested JSON so we have this conditional" when that could be a comment

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not to mention that sometimes, the code that's supposed to "speak for itself" doesn't do the things that they think it would do.

[–] kautau 6 points 1 month ago

Right. Given the option I will always choose to work with a decent programmer who can communicate well and documents their code, over a very strong programmer that doesn’t think they should waste time with documentation

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The code is speaking to me, but it's just word salad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In particular business logic that's not obvious should be documented in comments.

// Typically 1 = 1, but on March accounting wants that 1 = 2. This function makes that mapping.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
// 8 attempts have been made to clean up this code.
// A total of 47 hours have been wasted here. 
// Update the counters after your attempt.
[–] unreachable 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

# yeah, this needs to be done later

later: never

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Few of the good ones I've spotted:

(complicated business logic in messy code) // TODO: check

(...) // TODO: think about better naming

(...) // TODO: This is obviously shit and needs to be changed.

(...) // TODO: THIS IS NOT USED ANYWHERE CONSIDER REMOVING ALTOGETHER (comment made 3 years ago)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Break the code altogether and abandon it forever and just start over.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ToDo's belong in tickets, not in the code.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Todo with ticket number

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Write a ticket, mentioning "tackle TODOs" 😅

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

// Todo - Stuff

[–] chuckleslord 5 points 1 month ago

//TODO: Refactor this method Git commit date: 10‐11‐2016

[–] Gumbyyy 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hi it's me, your colleague

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hi colleague! So I found a comment in the code from 3 years ago by you saying you should "improve this". Is it planned for the next sprint?

[–] Gumbyyy 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll get right on that, as soon as I wrap up these 3 defects

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Just remember to mark all the things you'd like to make better but can't be arsed to at the moment with numerous TODOs.

[–] Phoenix3875 2 points 1 month ago

// TODO: Leave the code cleaner than you found

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Drake meme? Even with all the alternatives?
Ew